mirror of https://github.com/MISP/misp-rfc
				
				
				
			chg: [threat-actor-naming] directory reference added
TODO: one of the online directorypull/50/head
							parent
							
								
									2a9ea5fdf6
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						4ee3a6ae9c
					
				|  | @ -101,7 +101,7 @@ The name of the threat actor **MUST NOT** be based on the tools, techniques, or | |||
| 
 | ||||
| ## Directory | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| A reference registry of threat actors is **RECOMMENDED** to ensure consistency of names accross different parties.  | ||||
| A reference registry of threat actors is **RECOMMENDED** to ensure consistency of names accross different parties such as the threat actor MISP galaxy [@!MISP-G].  | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| # Examples | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  | @ -123,7 +123,7 @@ Naming a threat actor could include sensitive references to a case or an inciden | |||
| 
 | ||||
| # Acknowledgements | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback via Twitter. | ||||
| The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback through the now-defunct Twitter and other new social networks. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| # References | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  |  | |||
|  | @ -1452,7 +1452,7 @@ document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 <span>[<a href="#RFC2119 | |||
|         <h3 id="name-directory"> | ||||
| <a href="#section-2.6" class="section-number selfRef">2.6. </a><a href="#name-directory" class="section-name selfRef">Directory</a> | ||||
|         </h3> | ||||
| <p id="section-2.6-1">A reference registry of threat actors is <span class="bcp14">RECOMMENDED</span> to ensure consistency of names accross different parties.<a href="#section-2.6-1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p> | ||||
| <p id="section-2.6-1">A reference registry of threat actors is <span class="bcp14">RECOMMENDED</span> to ensure consistency of names accross different parties such as the threat actor MISP galaxy <span>[<a href="#MISP-G" class="cite xref">MISP-G</a>]</span>.<a href="#section-2.6-1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p> | ||||
| </section> | ||||
| </div> | ||||
| </section> | ||||
|  | @ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 <span>[<a href="#RFC2119 | |||
|       <h2 id="name-acknowledgements"> | ||||
| <a href="#section-5" class="section-number selfRef">5. </a><a href="#name-acknowledgements" class="section-name selfRef">Acknowledgements</a> | ||||
|       </h2> | ||||
| <p id="section-5-1">The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback via Twitter.<a href="#section-5-1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p> | ||||
| <p id="section-5-1">The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback through the now-defunct Twitter and other new social networks.<a href="#section-5-1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p> | ||||
| </section> | ||||
| </div> | ||||
| <div id="references"> | ||||
|  |  | |||
|  | @ -181,7 +181,8 @@ Internet-Draft   Recommendations on Naming Threat Actors   December 2024 | |||
| 2.6.  Directory | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|    A reference registry of threat actors is RECOMMENDED to ensure | ||||
|    consistency of names accross different parties. | ||||
|    consistency of names accross different parties such as the threat | ||||
|    actor MISP galaxy [MISP-G]. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 3.  Examples | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  | @ -208,8 +209,8 @@ Internet-Draft   Recommendations on Naming Threat Actors   December 2024 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| 5.  Acknowledgements | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|    The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback via | ||||
|    Twitter. | ||||
|    The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback | ||||
|    through the now-defunct Twitter and other new social networks. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 6.  References | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  | @ -220,7 +221,6 @@ Internet-Draft   Recommendations on Naming Threat Actors   December 2024 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Dulaunoy & Bourmeau       Expires 24 June 2025                  [Page 4] | ||||
|  | ||||
| Internet-Draft   Recommendations on Naming Threat Actors   December 2024 | ||||
|  |  | |||
|  | @ -76,7 +76,7 @@ document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 <xref target="RFC2119">< | |||
| </section> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| <section anchor="directory"><name>Directory</name> | ||||
| <t>A reference registry of threat actors is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to ensure consistency of names accross different parties.</t> | ||||
| <t>A reference registry of threat actors is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to ensure consistency of names accross different parties such as the threat actor MISP galaxy <xref target="MISP-G"></xref>.</t> | ||||
| </section> | ||||
| </section> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  | @ -102,7 +102,7 @@ document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 <xref target="RFC2119">< | |||
| </section> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| <section anchor="acknowledgements"><name>Acknowledgements</name> | ||||
| <t>The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback via Twitter.</t> | ||||
| <t>The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback through the now-defunct Twitter and other new social networks.</t> | ||||
| </section> | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| <section anchor="references"><name>References</name> | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue