mirror of https://github.com/MISP/misp-rfc
chg: [threat-actor-naming] directory reference added
TODO: one of the online directorypull/50/head
parent
2a9ea5fdf6
commit
4ee3a6ae9c
|
@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ The name of the threat actor **MUST NOT** be based on the tools, techniques, or
|
|||
|
||||
## Directory
|
||||
|
||||
A reference registry of threat actors is **RECOMMENDED** to ensure consistency of names accross different parties.
|
||||
A reference registry of threat actors is **RECOMMENDED** to ensure consistency of names accross different parties such as the threat actor MISP galaxy [@!MISP-G].
|
||||
|
||||
# Examples
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ Naming a threat actor could include sensitive references to a case or an inciden
|
|||
|
||||
# Acknowledgements
|
||||
|
||||
The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback via Twitter.
|
||||
The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback through the now-defunct Twitter and other new social networks.
|
||||
|
||||
# References
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1452,7 +1452,7 @@ document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 <span>[<a href="#RFC2119
|
|||
<h3 id="name-directory">
|
||||
<a href="#section-2.6" class="section-number selfRef">2.6. </a><a href="#name-directory" class="section-name selfRef">Directory</a>
|
||||
</h3>
|
||||
<p id="section-2.6-1">A reference registry of threat actors is <span class="bcp14">RECOMMENDED</span> to ensure consistency of names accross different parties.<a href="#section-2.6-1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
|
||||
<p id="section-2.6-1">A reference registry of threat actors is <span class="bcp14">RECOMMENDED</span> to ensure consistency of names accross different parties such as the threat actor MISP galaxy <span>[<a href="#MISP-G" class="cite xref">MISP-G</a>]</span>.<a href="#section-2.6-1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 <span>[<a href="#RFC2119
|
|||
<h2 id="name-acknowledgements">
|
||||
<a href="#section-5" class="section-number selfRef">5. </a><a href="#name-acknowledgements" class="section-name selfRef">Acknowledgements</a>
|
||||
</h2>
|
||||
<p id="section-5-1">The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback via Twitter.<a href="#section-5-1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
|
||||
<p id="section-5-1">The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback through the now-defunct Twitter and other new social networks.<a href="#section-5-1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div id="references">
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -181,7 +181,8 @@ Internet-Draft Recommendations on Naming Threat Actors December 2024
|
|||
2.6. Directory
|
||||
|
||||
A reference registry of threat actors is RECOMMENDED to ensure
|
||||
consistency of names accross different parties.
|
||||
consistency of names accross different parties such as the threat
|
||||
actor MISP galaxy [MISP-G].
|
||||
|
||||
3. Examples
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -208,8 +209,8 @@ Internet-Draft Recommendations on Naming Threat Actors December 2024
|
|||
|
||||
5. Acknowledgements
|
||||
|
||||
The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback via
|
||||
Twitter.
|
||||
The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback
|
||||
through the now-defunct Twitter and other new social networks.
|
||||
|
||||
6. References
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -220,7 +221,6 @@ Internet-Draft Recommendations on Naming Threat Actors December 2024
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Dulaunoy & Bourmeau Expires 24 June 2025 [Page 4]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft Recommendations on Naming Threat Actors December 2024
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 <xref target="RFC2119"><
|
|||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section anchor="directory"><name>Directory</name>
|
||||
<t>A reference registry of threat actors is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to ensure consistency of names accross different parties.</t>
|
||||
<t>A reference registry of threat actors is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to ensure consistency of names accross different parties such as the threat actor MISP galaxy <xref target="MISP-G"></xref>.</t>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 <xref target="RFC2119"><
|
|||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section anchor="acknowledgements"><name>Acknowledgements</name>
|
||||
<t>The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback via Twitter.</t>
|
||||
<t>The authors wish to thank all contributors who provided feedback through the now-defunct Twitter and other new social networks.</t>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section anchor="references"><name>References</name>
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue