{
  "namespace": "event-assessment",
  "expanded": "Event Assessment",
  "refs": [
    "http://www.foo.be/docs/intelligence/Tversky_Kahneman_1974.pdf",
    "http://www.foo.be/docs/intelligence/PsychofIntelNew.pdf"
  ],
  "description": "A series of assessment predicates describing the event assessment performed to make judgement(s) under a certain level of uncertainty.",
  "version": 2,
  "predicates": [
    {
      "value": "alternative-points-of-view-process",
      "expanded": "Alternative points of view process",
      "description": "A list of procedures or practices which describe alternative points of view to validate or rate an analysis. The list describes techniques or methods which could reinforce the estimative language in a human analysis and/or challenge the assumptions to reduce the potential bias of the analysis introduced by the analyst(s)."
    }
  ],
  "values": [
    {
      "predicate": "alternative-points-of-view-process",
      "entry": [
        {
          "value": "analytic-debates-within-the-organisation",
          "expanded": "analytic debates within the organisation"
        },
        {
          "value": "devils-advocates-methodology",
          "expanded": "Devil's advocates methodology"
        },
        {
          "value": "competitive-analysis",
          "expanded": "competitive analysis"
        },
        {
          "value": "interdisciplinary-brainstorming",
          "expanded": "interdisciplinary brainstorming"
        },
        {
          "value": "intra-office-peer-review",
          "expanded": "intra-office peer review"
        },
        {
          "value": "outside-expertise-review",
          "expanded": "Outside expertise review"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}