From 344891e5c1c33dbc05ab2dae2aca0703e260895e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexandre Dulaunoy Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:32:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] chg: [b.1] new slides --- .../content.tex | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/b.1-best-practices-in-threat-intelligence/content.tex b/b.1-best-practices-in-threat-intelligence/content.tex index d581d10..fdc23f7 100755 --- a/b.1-best-practices-in-threat-intelligence/content.tex +++ b/b.1-best-practices-in-threat-intelligence/content.tex @@ -57,9 +57,19 @@ \item {\bf Words of Estimative Probability}\footnote{\url{https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/sherman-kent-and-the-board-of-national-estimates-collected-essays/6words.html}} proposes clear wording while estimating probability of occurence from an event. \item A MISP taxonomy called {\bf estimative-language}\footnote{\url{https://www.misp-project.org/taxonomies.html}} proposes an applied model to tag information. \end{itemize} - \end{frame} +\begin{frame} + \frametitle{Reliability, credibility and confidence} +\begin{itemize} + \item The {\bf Admiralty Scale}\footnote{\url{https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/download/494/234}, {\it US Army Field Manual 2-22.3, 2006}} (also called the NATO System) is used to rank the reliability of a source and the credibility of an information + \item A MISP taxonomy called admiralty-scale\footnote{\url{https://www.misp-project.org/taxonomies.html}} + \item In {\bf JP 2-0, Joint Intelligence}\footnote{\url{http://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp2\_0.pdf} page 114} (page 114) includes an appendix to express confidence in analytic judgments + \item A MISP predicate in estimative-language called confidence-in-analytic-judgment\footnote{\url{https://www.misp-project.org/taxonomies.html}} +\end{itemize} +\end{frame} + + \begin{frame} \frametitle{Adding attributes/objects to an event} \begin{itemize}