pull/4846/head
Amber Brown 2019-03-13 01:17:51 +11:00
parent d306bd1b26
commit 797b6a63fc
4 changed files with 17 additions and 75 deletions

View File

@ -226,6 +226,11 @@ class HomeServer(object):
logger.info("Finished setting up.")
def setup_master(self):
"""
Some handlers have side effects on instantiation (like registering
background updates). This function causes them to be fetched, and
therefore instantiated, to run those side effects.
"""
for i in self.REQUIRED_ON_MASTER_STARTUP:
getattr(self, "get_" + i)()

View File

@ -26,10 +26,3 @@ CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS users_in_public_rooms (
);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX users_in_public_rooms_u_idx ON users_in_public_rooms(user_id, room_id);
-- Track what users are publicly visible
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS publicly_visible_users (
user_id TEXT NOT NULL
);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX publicly_visible_users_u_idx ON publicly_visible_users(user_id);

View File

@ -240,9 +240,6 @@ class UserDirectoryStore(SQLBaseStore):
self._simple_delete_txn(
txn, table="user_directory_search", keyvalues={"user_id": user_id}
)
self._simple_delete_txn(
txn, table="publicly_visible_users", keyvalues={"user_id": user_id}
)
self._simple_delete_txn(
txn, table="users_in_public_rooms", keyvalues={"user_id": user_id}
)
@ -352,18 +349,6 @@ class UserDirectoryStore(SQLBaseStore):
value_values=None,
)
# If it's a public room, also update them in publicly_visible_users.
# We don't look before they're in the table before we do it, as it's
# more efficient to simply have Postgres do that (one UPSERT vs one
# SELECT and maybe one INSERT).
for user_id in user_ids:
self._simple_upsert_txn(
txn,
"publicly_visible_users",
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id},
values={},
)
return self.runInteraction(
"add_users_in_public_rooms", _add_users_in_public_rooms_txn
)
@ -395,20 +380,6 @@ class UserDirectoryStore(SQLBaseStore):
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id, "room_id": room_id},
)
# Are the users still in a public room after we deleted them from this one?
still_in_public = self._simple_select_one_onecol_txn(
txn,
"users_in_public_rooms",
keyvalues={"user_id": user_id},
retcol="user_id",
allow_none=True,
)
if still_in_public is None:
self._simple_delete_txn(
txn, table="publicly_visible_users", keyvalues={"user_id": user_id}
)
return self.runInteraction(
"remove_user_who_share_room", _remove_user_who_share_room_txn
)
@ -476,7 +447,6 @@ class UserDirectoryStore(SQLBaseStore):
txn.execute("DELETE FROM user_directory")
txn.execute("DELETE FROM user_directory_search")
txn.execute("DELETE FROM users_in_public_rooms")
txn.execute("DELETE FROM publicly_visible_users")
txn.execute("DELETE FROM users_who_share_private_rooms")
txn.call_after(self.get_user_in_directory.invalidate_all)
@ -583,22 +553,19 @@ class UserDirectoryStore(SQLBaseStore):
"""
if self.hs.config.user_directory_search_all_users:
# make s.user_id null to keep the ordering algorithm happy
join_clause = """
CROSS JOIN (SELECT NULL as user_id) AS s
"""
join_args = ()
where_clause = "1=1"
else:
join_clause = """
LEFT JOIN publicly_visible_users AS p USING (user_id)
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT other_user_id AS user_id FROM users_who_share_private_rooms
WHERE user_id = ?
) AS s USING (user_id)
"""
join_args = (user_id,)
where_clause = "(s.user_id IS NOT NULL OR p.user_id IS NOT NULL)"
where_clause = """
(
EXISTS (select 1 from users_in_public_rooms WHERE user_id = t.user_id)
OR EXISTS (
SELECT 1 FROM users_who_share_private_rooms
WHERE user_id = ? AND other_user_id = t.user_id
)
)
"""
if isinstance(self.database_engine, PostgresEngine):
full_query, exact_query, prefix_query = _parse_query_postgres(search_term)
@ -610,9 +577,8 @@ class UserDirectoryStore(SQLBaseStore):
# search: (domain, _, display name, localpart)
sql = """
SELECT d.user_id AS user_id, display_name, avatar_url
FROM user_directory_search
FROM user_directory_search as t
INNER JOIN user_directory AS d USING (user_id)
%s
WHERE
%s
AND vector @@ to_tsquery('english', ?)
@ -639,7 +605,6 @@ class UserDirectoryStore(SQLBaseStore):
avatar_url IS NULL
LIMIT ?
""" % (
join_clause,
where_clause,
)
args = join_args + (full_query, exact_query, prefix_query, limit + 1)
@ -648,9 +613,8 @@ class UserDirectoryStore(SQLBaseStore):
sql = """
SELECT d.user_id AS user_id, display_name, avatar_url
FROM user_directory_search
FROM user_directory_search as t
INNER JOIN user_directory AS d USING (user_id)
%s
WHERE
%s
AND value MATCH ?
@ -660,7 +624,6 @@ class UserDirectoryStore(SQLBaseStore):
avatar_url IS NULL
LIMIT ?
""" % (
join_clause,
where_clause,
)
args = join_args + (search_query, limit + 1)

View File

@ -116,9 +116,7 @@ class UserDirectoryTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
# Check we have populated the database correctly.
shares_private = self.get_users_who_share_private_rooms()
public_users = self.get_users_in_public_rooms()
visible_users = self.get_publicly_visible_users()
self.assertEqual(visible_users, [])
self.assertEqual(
self._compress_shared(shares_private), set([(u1, u2, room), (u2, u1, room)])
)
@ -142,9 +140,7 @@ class UserDirectoryTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
# Check we have removed the values.
shares_private = self.get_users_who_share_private_rooms()
public_users = self.get_users_in_public_rooms()
visible_users = self.get_publicly_visible_users()
self.assertEqual(visible_users, [])
self.assertEqual(self._compress_shared(shares_private), set())
self.assertEqual(public_users, [])
@ -177,15 +173,6 @@ class UserDirectoryTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
retval.append((i["user_id"], i["room_id"]))
return retval
def get_publicly_visible_users(self):
return self.get_success(
self.store._simple_select_onecol(
"publicly_visible_users",
None,
"user_id",
)
)
def get_users_who_share_private_rooms(self):
return self.get_success(
self.store._simple_select_list(
@ -219,11 +206,9 @@ class UserDirectoryTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
shares_private = self.get_users_who_share_private_rooms()
public_users = self.get_users_in_public_rooms()
visible_users = self.get_publicly_visible_users()
# Nothing updated yet
self.assertEqual(shares_private, [])
self.assertEqual(visible_users, [])
self.assertEqual(public_users, [])
# Reset the handled users caches
@ -241,9 +226,8 @@ class UserDirectoryTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
shares_private = self.get_users_who_share_private_rooms()
public_users = self.get_users_in_public_rooms()
visible_users = self.get_publicly_visible_users()
# User 1 and User 2 share public rooms
# User 1 and User 2 are in the same public room
self.assertEqual(
set(public_users), set([(u1, room), (u2, room)])
)
@ -254,9 +238,6 @@ class UserDirectoryTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
set([(u1, u3, private_room), (u3, u1, private_room)]),
)
# User 1 and 2 are in public rooms
self.assertEqual(set(visible_users), set([u1, u2]))
def test_search_all_users(self):
"""
Search all users = True means that a user does not have to share a