Add docs for undoing room shutdowns (#7998)
These docs were tested successfully in production by a customer, so it's probably fine.pull/8011/head
parent
6d4b790021
commit
e2a4ba6f9b
|
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|||
Add documentation for how to undo a room shutdown.
|
|
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ You will need to authenticate with an access token for an admin user.
|
|||
* `message` - Optional. A string containing the first message that will be sent as
|
||||
`new_room_user_id` in the new room. Ideally this will clearly convey why the
|
||||
original room was shut down.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
If not specified, the default value of `room_name` is "Content Violation
|
||||
Notification". The default value of `message` is "Sharing illegal content on
|
||||
othis server is not permitted and rooms in violation will be blocked."
|
||||
|
@ -72,3 +72,23 @@ Response:
|
|||
"new_room_id": "!newroomid:example.com",
|
||||
},
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Undoing room shutdowns
|
||||
|
||||
*Note*: This guide may be outdated by the time you read it. By nature of room shutdowns being performed at the database level,
|
||||
the structure can and does change without notice.
|
||||
|
||||
First, it's important to understand that a room shutdown is very destructive. Undoing a shutdown is not as simple as pretending it
|
||||
never happened - work has to be done to move forward instead of resetting the past.
|
||||
|
||||
1. For safety reasons, it is recommended to shut down Synapse prior to continuing.
|
||||
2. In the database, run `DELETE FROM blocked_rooms WHERE room_id = '!example:example.org';`
|
||||
* For caution: it's recommended to run this in a transaction: `BEGIN; DELETE ...;`, verify you got 1 result, then `COMMIT;`.
|
||||
* The room ID is the same one supplied to the shutdown room API, not the Content Violation room.
|
||||
3. Restart Synapse (required).
|
||||
|
||||
You will have to manually handle, if you so choose, the following:
|
||||
|
||||
* Aliases that would have been redirected to the Content Violation room.
|
||||
* Users that would have been booted from the room (and will have been force-joined to the Content Violation room).
|
||||
* Removal of the Content Violation room if desired.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue