The location of the redacts field changes in room version 11. Ensure
it is copied to the *new* location for *old* room versions for
forwards-compatibility with clients.
Note that copying it to the *old* location for the *new* room version
was previously handled.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Werner <n.werner@famedly.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Werner <n.werner@famedly.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Werner <89468146+nico-famedly@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Hubert Chathi <hubert@uhoreg.ca>
And fix a bug in the implementation of the updated redaction
format (MSC2174) where the top-level redacts field was not
properly added for backwards-compatibility.
Allow configuring the set of workers to proxy outbound federation traffic through (`outbound_federation_restricted_to`).
This is useful when you have a worker setup with `federation_sender` instances responsible for sending outbound federation requests and want to make sure *all* outbound federation traffic goes through those instances. Before this change, the generic workers would still contact federation themselves for things like profile lookups, backfill, etc. This PR allows you to set more strict access controls/firewall for all workers and only allow the `federation_sender`'s to contact the outside world.
Allow configuring the set of workers to proxy outbound federation traffic through (`outbound_federation_restricted_to`).
This is useful when you have a worker setup with `federation_sender` instances responsible for sending outbound federation requests and want to make sure *all* outbound federation traffic goes through those instances. Before this change, the generic workers would still contact federation themselves for things like profile lookups, backfill, etc. This PR allows you to set more strict access controls/firewall for all workers and only allow the `federation_sender`'s to contact the outside world.
The original code is from @erikjohnston's branches which I've gotten in-shape to merge.
* Check required power levels earlier in createRoom handler.
- If a server was configured to reject the creation of rooms with E2EE
enabled (by specifying an unattainably high power level for
"m.room.encryption" in default_power_level_content_override), the 403
error was not being triggered until after the room was created and
before the "m.room.power_levels" was sent. This allowed a user to
access the partially-configured room and complete the setup of E2EE
and power levels manually.
- This change causes the power level overrides to be checked earlier and
the request to be rejected before the user gains access to the room.
- A new `_validate_room_config` method is added to contain checks that
should be run before a room is created.
- The new test case confirms that a user request is rejected by the new
validation method.
Signed-off-by: Grant McLean <grant@catalyst.net.nz>
* Add a changelog file.
* Formatting fix for black.
* Remove unneeded line from test.
---------
Signed-off-by: Grant McLean <grant@catalyst.net.nz>
Implements stable support for MSC3882; this involves updating Synapse's support to
match the MSC / the spec says.
Continue to support the unstable version to allow clients to transition.
The stubs have some issues so this has some generous cast
and ignores in it, but it is better than not having stubs.
Note that confusing that Element is a function which creates
_Element instances (and similarly for Comment).
If the previous read marker is pointing to an event that no longer exists
(e.g. due to retention) then assume that the newly given read marker
is newer.
To track changes in MSC2666:
- The change from `/mutual_rooms/{user_id}` to `/mutual_rooms?user_id={user_id}`.
- The addition of `next_batch_token` (and logic).
- Unstable flag now being `uk.half-shot.msc2666.query_mutual_rooms`.
- The error code when your own user is requested.
There are two situations which were previously not properly checked:
1. If the requested URL was replaced with an oEmbed URL, then the
oEmbed URL was not checked against url_preview_url_blacklist.
2. Follow-up URLs (either via autodiscovery of oEmbed or to pre-cache
images) were not checked against url_preview_url_blacklist.
This stops media (and thumbnails) from being accessed from the
listed domains. It does not delete any already locally cached media,
but will prevent accessing it.
Note that admin APIs are unaffected by this change.
Adds an optional keyword argument to the /relations API which
will recurse a limited number of event relationships.
This will cause the API to return not just the events related to the
parent event, but also events related to those related to the parent
event, etc.
This is disabled by default behind an experimental configuration
flag and is currently implemented using prefixed parameters.
This moves `redacts` from being a top-level property to
a `content` property in a new room version.
MSC2176 (which was previously implemented) states to not
`redact` this property.
* Revert "Fix registering a device on an account with lots of devices (#15348)"
This reverts commit f0d8f66eaa.
* Revert "Delete stale non-e2e devices for users, take 3 (#15183)"
This reverts commit 78cdb72cd6.
This makes it so that we rely on the `device_id` to delete pushers on logout,
instead of relying on the `access_token_id`. This ensures we're not removing
pushers on token refresh, and prepares for a world without access token IDs
(also known as the OIDC).
This actually runs the `set_device_id_for_pushers` background update, which
was forgotten in #13831.
Note that for backwards compatibility it still deletes pushers based on the
`access_token` until the background update finishes.
When a room is deleted in Synapse we remove the event forward
extremities in the room, so if (say a bot) tries to send a message into
the room we error out due to not being able to calculate prev events for
the new event *before* we check if the sender is in the room.
Fixes#8094
Enables MSC3925 support by default, which:
* Includes the full edit event in the bundled aggregations of an
edited event.
* Stops modifying the original event's content to return the new
content from the edit event.
This is a backwards-incompatible change that is considered to be
"correct" by the spec.
Patrick Cloke