Currently we only have the one event format version defined, but this
adds the necessary infrastructure to persist and fetch the format
versions alongside the events.
We specify the format version rather than the room version as:
1. We don't necessarily know the room version, existing events may be
either v1 or v2.
2. We'd need to be careful to prevent/handle correctly if different
events in the same room reported to be of different versions, which
sounds annoying.
This allows the OpenID userinfo endpoint to be active even if the
federation resource is not active. The OpenID userinfo endpoint
is called by integration managers to verify user actions using the
client API OpenID access token. Without this verification, the
integration manager cannot know that the access token is valid.
The OpenID userinfo endpoint will be loaded in the case that either
"federation" or "openid" resource is defined. The new "openid"
resource is defaulted to active in default configuration.
Signed-off-by: Jason Robinson <jasonr@matrix.org>
For all the homeserver classes, only the FrontendProxyServer passes
its reactor when doing the http listen. Looking at previous PR's looks
like this was introduced to make it possible to write a test, otherwise
when you try to run a test with the test homeserver it tries to
do a real bind to a port. Passing the reactor that the homeserver
is instantiated with should probably be the right thing to do anyway?
Signed-off-by: Jason Robinson <jasonr@matrix.org>
For all the homeserver classes, only the FrontendProxyServer passes
its reactor when doing the http listen. Looking at previous PR's looks
like this was introduced to make it possible to write a test, otherwise
when you try to run a test with the test homeserver it tries to
do a real bind to a port. Passing the reactor that the homeserver
is instantiated with should probably be the right thing to do anyway?
Signed-off-by: Jason Robinson <jasonr@matrix.org>
This was caused by accidentally overwritting a `last_seen` variable
in a for loop, causing the wrong value to be written to the progress
table. The result of which was that we didn't scan sections of the table
when searching for duplicates, and so some duplicates did not get
deleted.
Erik Johnston