* Fix rare bug that broke looping calls
We can't interact with the reactor from the main thread via looping
call.
Introduced in v1.90.0 / #15791.
* Newsfile
* Properly update retry_last_ts when hitting the maximum retry interval
This was broken in 1.87 when the maximum retry interval got changed from
almost infinite to a week (and made configurable).
fixes#16101
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Werner <nicolas.werner@hotmail.de>
* Add changelog
* Change fix + add test
* Add comment
---------
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Werner <nicolas.werner@hotmail.de>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Velten <mathieuv@matrix.org>
If we don't have all the auth events in a room then not all state events will have a chain cover index. Even so, we can still use the chain cover index on the events that do have it, rather than bailing and using the slower functions.
This situation should not arise for newly persisted rooms, as we check we have the full auth chain for each event, but can happen for existing rooms.
c.f. #15245
We were seeing serialization errors when taking out multiple read locks.
The transactions were retried, so isn't causing any failures.
Introduced in #15782.
* Add a cache invalidation clean-up task
* Run the cache invalidation stream clean-up on the background worker
* Tune down
* call_later is in millis!
* Newsfile
Signed-off-by: Olivier Wilkinson (reivilibre) <oliverw@matrix.org>
* fixup! Add a cache invalidation clean-up task
* Update synapse/storage/databases/main/cache.py
Co-authored-by: Eric Eastwood <erice@element.io>
* Update synapse/storage/databases/main/cache.py
Co-authored-by: Eric Eastwood <erice@element.io>
* MILLISEC -> MS
* Expand on comment
* Move and tweak comment about Postgres
* Use `wrap_as_background_process`
---------
Signed-off-by: Olivier Wilkinson (reivilibre) <oliverw@matrix.org>
Co-authored-by: Eric Eastwood <erice@element.io>
For now this maintains compatible with old Synapses by falling back
to using transaction semantics on a per-access token. A future version
of Synapse will drop support for this.
And fix a bug in the implementation of the updated redaction
format (MSC2174) where the top-level redacts field was not
properly added for backwards-compatibility.
David Robertson