Currently we store all access tokens in the DB, and fall back to that
check if we can't validate the macaroon, so our fallback works here, but
for guests, their macaroons don't get persisted, so we don't get to
find them in the database. Each restart, we generate a new ephemeral
key, so guests lose access after each server restart.
I tried to fix up the config stuff to be less insane, but gave up, so
instead I bolt on yet another piece of custom one-off insanity.
Also, add some basic tests for config generation and loading.
Introduce a User object
I'm sick of passing around more and more things as tuple items around
the whole world, and needing to edit every call site every time there is
more information about a user. So pass them around together as an
object.
This object has incredibly poorly named fields because we have a
convention that `user` indicates a UserID object, and `user_id`
indicates a string. I tried to clean up the whole repo to fix this, but
gave up. So instead, I introduce a second convention. A user_object is a
User, and a user_id_object is a UserId. I may have cried a little bit.
This tracks data about the entity which made the request. This is
instead of passing around a tuple, which requires call-site
modifications every time a new piece of optional context is passed
around.
I tried to introduce a User object. I gave up.
For some reason, one test imports Mock class from mock.mock
rather than from mock.
This change fixes this error.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Girko <ol@infoserver.lv>
Changes to m.room.power_levels events are supposed to be handled at a high
priority; however a typo meant that the relevant bit of code was never
executed, so they were handled just like any other state change - which meant
that a bad person could cause room state changes by forking the graph from a
point in history when they were allowed to do so.
Daniel Wagner-Hall