Add a 'devices' table to the storage, as well as a 'device_id' column to
refresh_tokens.
Allow the client to pass a device_id, and initial_device_display_name, to
/login. If login is successful, then register the device in the devices table
if it wasn't known already. If no device_id was supplied, make one up.
Associate the device_id with the access token and refresh token, so that we can
get at it again later. Ensure that the device_id is copied from the refresh
token to the access_token when the token is refreshed.
Make sure that we have the canonical user_id *before* calling
get_login_tuple_for_user_id.
Replace login_with_password with a method which just validates the password,
and have the caller call get_login_tuple_for_user_id. This brings the password
flow into line with the other flows, and will give us a place to register the
device_id if necessary.
Use the pure-python ldap3 library, which eliminates the need for a
system dependency.
Offer both a `search` and `simple_bind` mode, for more sophisticated
ldap scenarios.
- `search` tries to find a matching DN within the `user_base` while
employing the `user_filter`, then tries the bind when a single
matching DN was found.
- `simple_bind` tries the bind against a specific DN by combining the
localpart and `user_base`
Offer support for STARTTLS on a plain connection.
The configuration was changed to reflect these new possibilities.
Signed-off-by: Martin Weinelt <hexa@darmstadt.ccc.de>
- At the very least, this TypeError caused logins to fail on my own
running instance of Synapse, and the simple (explicit) UTF-8
conversion resolved login errors for me.
Signed-off-by: Salvatore LaMendola <salvatore.lamendola@gmail.com>
Were it not for that fact that you can't use the base handler in the pusher because it pulls in the world. Comitting while I fix that on a different branch.
pycharm supports them so there is no need to use the other format.
Might as well convert the existing strings to reduce the risk of
people accidentally cargo culting the wrong doc string format.
This follows the same flows-based flow as regular registration, but as
the only implemented flow has no requirements, it auto-succeeds. In the
future, other flows (e.g. captcha) may be required, so clients should
treat this like the regular registration flow choices.
Richard van der Hoff