Expressions don't expand in single quotes, use double quotes for that.
https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck/wiki/SC2016
This specifically warned about the '$aregis...' part of the sed script.
Which is a relatively obscure use of sed.
Splitting this into two commands makes its intent more obvious and
avoids contravening Shellcheck's lints.
Signed-off-by: Dan Callahan <danc@element.io>
SC2089: Quotes/backslashes will be treated literally. Use an array.
https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck/wiki/SC2089
SC2090: Quotes/backslashes in this variable will not be respected.
https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck/wiki/SC2090
Putting literal JSON in a variable mistakenly triggers these warnings.
Instead of adding ignore directives, this can be avoided by inlining the
JSON data into the curl invocation.
Since the variable is only used in this one location, inlining is fine.
Signed-off-by: Dan Callahan <danc@element.io>
`synapse.config.__main__` has the possibility to read a config item. This can be used to conveniently also validate the config is valid before trying to start Synapse.
The "read" command broke in https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/10916 as it now requires passing in "server.server_name" for example.
Also made the read command optional so one can just call this with just the confirm file reference and get a "Config parses OK" if things are ok.
Signed-off-by: Jason Robinson <jasonr@matrix.org>
Co-authored-by: Brendan Abolivier <babolivier@matrix.org>
* We only need to fetch users in private rooms
* Filter out `user_id` at the top
* Discard excluded users in the top loop
We weren't doing this in the "First, if they're our user" branch so this
is a bugfix.
* The caller must check that `user_id` is included
This is in the docstring. There are two call sites:
- one in `_handle_room_publicity_change`, which explicitly checks before calling;
- and another in `_handle_room_membership_event`, which returns early if
the user is excluded.
So this change is safe.
* Test joining a private room with an excluded user
* Tweak an existing test
* Changelog
* test docstring
* lint
If we find ourselves dealing with rejected events, we proably want to know
about it. Let's include it in the stringification of the event so that it gets
logged.
Currently, when we receive an event whose auth_events differ from those we expect, we state-resolve between the two state sets, and check that the event passes auth based on the resolved state.
This means that it's possible for us to accept events which don't pass auth at their declared auth_events (or where the auth events themselves were rejected), leading to problems down the line like #10083.
This change means we will:
* ignore any events where we cannot find the auth events
* reject any events whose auth events were rejected
* reject any events which do not pass auth at their declared auth_events.
Together with a whole raft of previous work, this is a partial fix to #9595.
Fixes#6643.
Based on #11009.
This fixes a bug where we would accept an event whose `auth_events` include
rejected events, if the rejected event was shadowed by another `auth_event`
with same `(type, state_key)`.
The approach is to pass a list of auth events into
`check_auth_rules_for_event` instead of a dict, which of course means updating
the call sites.
This is an extension of #10956.
Dan Callahan