* Formally type the UserProfile in user searches
* export UserProfile in synapse.module_api
* Update docs
Co-authored-by: Sean Quah <8349537+squahtx@users.noreply.github.com>
An error occured if a filter was supplied with `event_fields` which did not include
`unsigned`.
In that case, bundled aggregations are still added as the spec states it is allowed
for servers to add additional fields.
The unstable identifiers are still supported if the experimental configuration
flag is enabled. The unstable identifiers will be removed in a future release.
When we get a partial_state response from send_join, store information in the
database about it:
* store a record about the room as a whole having partial state, and stash the
list of member servers too.
* flag the join event itself as having partial state
* also, for any new events whose prev-events are partial-stated, note that
they will *also* be partial-stated.
We don't yet make any attempt to interpret this data, so API calls (and a bunch
of other things) are just going to get incorrect data.
If the latest event in a thread was edited than the original
event content was included in bundled aggregation for
threads instead of the edited event content.
This is some odds and ends found during the review of #11791
and while continuing to work in this code:
* Return attrs classes instead of dictionaries from some methods
to improve type safety.
* Call `get_bundled_aggregations` fewer times.
* Adds a missing assertion in the tests.
* Do not return empty bundled aggregations for an event (preferring
to not include the bundle at all, as the docstring states).
Similar to #11817.
In `_create_power_level_validator` we
- retrieve `validator`. This is a class implementing the
`jsonschema.protocols.Validator` interface. In other words,
`validator: Type[jsonschema.protocols.Validator]`.
- we then create an second validator class by modifying the original
`validator`. We return that class, which is also of type
`Type[jsonschema.protocols.Validator]`.
So the original annotation was incorrect: it claimed we were returning
an instance of jsonSchema.Draft7Validator, not the class (or a subclass)
itself. (Strictly speaking this is incorrect, because `POWER_LEVELS_SCHEMA`
isn't pinned to a particular version of JSON Schema. But there are other
complications with the type stubs if you try to fix this; I felt like
the change herein was a decent compromise that better expresses intent).
(I suspect/hope the typeshed project would welcome an effort to improve
the jsonschema stubs. Let's see if I get some spare time.)
This makes the serialization of events synchronous (and it no
longer access the database), but we must manually calculate and
provide the bundled aggregations.
Overall this should cause no change in behavior, but is prep work
for other improvements.
Due to updates to MSC2675 this includes a few fixes:
* Include bundled aggregations for /sync.
* Do not include bundled aggregations for /initialSync and /events.
* Do not bundle aggregations for state events.
* Clarifies comments and variable names.
If we find ourselves dealing with rejected events, we proably want to know
about it. Let's include it in the stringification of the event so that it gets
logged.
This fixes a "Event not signed by authorising server" error when
transition room member from join -> join, e.g. when updating a
display name or avatar URL for restricted rooms.
This is in the context of creating new module callbacks that modules in https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse-dinsic can use, in an effort to reconcile the spam checker API in synapse-dinsic with the one in mainline.
This adds a callback that's fairly similar to user_may_create_room except it also allows processing based on the invites sent at room creation.
Constructing an EventContext for an outlier is actually really simple, and
there's no sense in going via an `async` method in the `StateHandler`.
This also means that we can resolve a bunch of FIXMEs.
I meant to do this before, in #10591, but because I'm stupid I forgot to do it
for V2 and V3 events.
I've factored the common code out to `EventBase` to save us having two copies
of it.
This means that for `FrozenEvent` we replace `self.get("event_id", None)` with
`self.event_id`, which I think is safe. `get()` is an alias for
`self._dict.get()`, whereas `event_id()` is an `@property` method which looks
up `self._event_id`, which is populated during construction from the same
dict. We don't seem to rely on the fallback, because if the `event_id` key is
absent from the dict then construction of the `EventBase` object will
fail.
Long story short, the only way this could change behaviour is if
`event_dict["event_id"]` is changed *after* the `EventBase` object is
constructed without updating the `_event_id` field, or vice versa - either of
which would be very problematic anyway and the behavior of `str(event)` is the
least of our worries.
Patrick Cloke