As part of the database migration to support threaded receipts, there is
a possible window in between
`73/08thread_receipts_non_null.sql.postgres` removing the original
unique constraints on `receipts_linearized` and `receipts_graph` and the
`reeipts_linearized_unique_index` and `receipts_graph_unique_index`
background updates from `72/08thread_receipts.sql` completing where
the unique constraints on `receipts_linearized` and `receipts_graph` are
missing. Any emulated upserts on these tables must therefore be
performed with a lock held, otherwise duplicate rows can end up in the
tables when there are concurrent emulated upserts. Fix the missing lock.
Note that emulated upserts no longer happen by default on sqlite, since
the minimum supported version of sqlite supports native upserts by
default now.
Finally, clean up any duplicate receipts that may have crept in before
trying to create the `receipts_graph_unique_index` and
`receipts_linearized_unique_index` unique indexes.
Signed-off-by: Sean Quah <seanq@matrix.org>
Fix https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/13856
Fix https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/13865
> Discovered while trying to make Synapse fast enough for [this MSC2716 test for importing many batches](https://github.com/matrix-org/complement/pull/214#discussion_r741678240). As an example, disabling the `have_seen_event` cache saves 10 seconds for each `/messages` request in that MSC2716 Complement test because we're not making as many federation requests for `/state` (speeding up `have_seen_event` itself is related to https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/13625)
>
> But this will also make `/messages` faster in general so we can include it in the [faster `/messages` milestone](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/milestone/11).
>
> *-- https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/13856*
### The problem
`_invalidate_caches_for_event` doesn't run in monolith mode which means we never even tried to clear the `have_seen_event` and other caches. And even in worker mode, it only runs on the workers, not the master (AFAICT).
Additionally there was bug with the key being wrong so `_invalidate_caches_for_event` never invalidates the `have_seen_event` cache even when it does run.
Because we were using the `@cachedList` wrong, it was putting items in the cache under keys like `((room_id, event_id),)` with a `set` in a `set` (ex. `(('!TnCIJPKzdQdUlIyXdQ:test', '$Iu0eqEBN7qcyF1S9B3oNB3I91v2o5YOgRNPwi_78s-k'),)`) and we we're trying to invalidate with just `(room_id, event_id)` which did nothing.
Some experimental prep work to enable external event caching based on #9379 & #12955. Doesn't actually move the cache at all, just lays the groundwork for async implemented caches.
Signed off by Nick @ Beeper (@Fizzadar)
I've seen a few errors which can only plausibly be explained by the calculated
event id for an event being different from the ID of the event in the
database. It should be cheap to check this, so let's do so and raise an
exception.
Multiple calls to `EventsWorkerStore._get_events_from_cache_or_db` can
reuse the same database fetch, which is initiated by the first call.
Ensure that cancelling the first call doesn't cancel the other calls
sharing the same database fetch.
Signed-off-by: Sean Quah <seanq@element.io>
The previous fix for the ongoing event fetches counter
(8eec25a1d9) was both insufficient and
incorrect.
When the database is unreachable, `_do_fetch` never gets run and so
`_event_fetch_ongoing` is never decremented.
The previous fix also moved the `_event_fetch_ongoing` decrement outside
of the `_event_fetch_lock` which allowed race conditions to corrupt the
counter.
Fix a long-standing bug where a batch of user directory changes would be
silently dropped if the server left a room early in the batch.
* Pull out `wait_for_background_update` in tests
Co-authored-by: Patrick Cloke <clokep@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
Empirically, this helped my server considerably when handling gaps in Matrix HQ. The problem was that we would repeatedly call have_seen_events for the same set of (50K or so) auth_events, each of which would take many minutes to complete, even though it's only an index scan.
Sean Quah