mastodon/spec/models/concerns/account/interactions_spec.rb

713 lines
21 KiB
Ruby
Raw Normal View History

# frozen_string_literal: true
Optional notification muting (#5087) * Add a hide_notifications column to mutes * Add muting_notifications? and a notifications argument to mute! * block notifications in notify_service from hard muted accounts * Add specs for how mute! interacts with muting_notifications? * specs testing that hide_notifications in mutes actually hides notifications * Add support for muting notifications in MuteService * API support for muting notifications (and specs) * Less gross passing of notifications flag * Break out a separate mute modal with a hide-notifications checkbox. * Convert profile header mute to use mute modal * Satisfy eslint. * specs for MuteService notifications params * add trailing newlines to files for Pork :) * Put the label for the hide notifications checkbox in a label element. * Add a /api/v1/mutes/details route that just returns the array of mutes. * Define a serializer for /api/v1/mutes/details * Add more specs for the /api/v1/mutes/details endpoint * Expose whether a mute hides notifications in the api/v1/relationships endpoint * Show whether muted users' notifications are muted in account lists * Allow modifying the hide_notifications of a mute with the /api/v1/accounts/:id/mute endpoint * make the hide/unhide notifications buttons work * satisfy eslint * In probably dead code, replace a dispatch of muteAccount that was skipping the modal with launching the mute modal. * fix a missing import * add an explanatory comment to AccountInteractions * Refactor handling of default params for muting to make code cleaner * minor code style fixes oops * Fixed a typo that was breaking the account mute API endpoint * Apply white-space: nowrap to account relationships icons * Fix code style issues * Remove superfluous blank line * Rename /api/v1/mutes/details -> /api/v2/mutes * Don't serialize "account" in MuteSerializer Doing so is somewhat unnecessary since it's always the current user's account. * Fix wrong variable name in api/v2/mutes * Use Toggle in place of checkbox in the mute modal. * Make the Toggle in the mute modal look better * Code style changes in specs and removed an extra space * Code review suggestions from akihikodaki Also fixed a syntax error in tests for AccountInteractions. * Make AddHideNotificationsToMute Concurrent It's not clear how much this will benefit instances in practice, as the number of mutes tends to be pretty small, but this should prevent any blocking migrations nonetheless. * Fix up migration things * Remove /api/v2/mutes
2017-11-15 03:56:41 +01:00
require 'rails_helper'
describe Account::Interactions do
let(:account) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'account') }
let(:account_id) { account.id }
let(:account_ids) { [account_id] }
let(:target_account) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'target') }
let(:target_account_id) { target_account.id }
let(:target_account_ids) { [target_account_id] }
describe '.following_map' do
subject { Account.following_map(target_account_ids, account_id) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when Account with Follow' do
it 'returns { target_account_id => true }' do
Fabricate(:follow, account: account, target_account: target_account)
expect(subject).to eq(target_account_id => { reblogs: true, notify: false, languages: nil })
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when Account without Follow' do
it 'returns {}' do
expect(subject).to eq({})
end
end
end
describe '.followed_by_map' do
subject { Account.followed_by_map(target_account_ids, account_id) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when Account with Follow' do
it 'returns { target_account_id => true }' do
Fabricate(:follow, account: target_account, target_account: account)
expect(subject).to eq(target_account_id => true)
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when Account without Follow' do
it 'returns {}' do
expect(subject).to eq({})
end
end
end
describe '.blocking_map' do
subject { Account.blocking_map(target_account_ids, account_id) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when Account with Block' do
it 'returns { target_account_id => true }' do
Fabricate(:block, account: account, target_account: target_account)
expect(subject).to eq(target_account_id => true)
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when Account without Block' do
it 'returns {}' do
expect(subject).to eq({})
end
end
end
describe '.muting_map' do
subject { Account.muting_map(target_account_ids, account_id) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when Account with Mute' do
before do
Fabricate(:mute, target_account: target_account, account: account, hide_notifications: hide)
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when Mute#hide_notifications?' do
let(:hide) { true }
it 'returns { target_account_id => { notifications: true } }' do
expect(subject).to eq(target_account_id => { notifications: true })
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not Mute#hide_notifications?' do
let(:hide) { false }
it 'returns { target_account_id => { notifications: false } }' do
expect(subject).to eq(target_account_id => { notifications: false })
end
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when Account without Mute' do
it 'returns {}' do
expect(subject).to eq({})
end
end
end
describe '#follow!' do
it 'creates and returns Follow' do
expect do
expect(account.follow!(target_account)).to be_a Follow
end.to change { account.following.count }.by 1
end
end
describe '#block' do
it 'creates and returns Block' do
expect do
expect(account.block!(target_account)).to be_a Block
end.to change { account.block_relationships.count }.by 1
end
end
describe '#mute!' do
subject { account.mute!(target_account, notifications: arg_notifications) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when Mute does not exist yet' do
context 'when arg :notifications is nil' do
let(:arg_notifications) { nil }
it 'creates Mute, and returns Mute' do
expect do
expect(subject).to be_a Mute
end.to change { account.mute_relationships.count }.by 1
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when arg :notifications is false' do
let(:arg_notifications) { false }
it 'creates Mute, and returns Mute' do
expect do
expect(subject).to be_a Mute
end.to change { account.mute_relationships.count }.by 1
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when arg :notifications is true' do
let(:arg_notifications) { true }
it 'creates Mute, and returns Mute' do
expect do
expect(subject).to be_a Mute
end.to change { account.mute_relationships.count }.by 1
end
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when Mute already exists' do
before do
account.mute_relationships << mute
end
let(:mute) do
Fabricate(:mute,
account: account,
target_account: target_account,
hide_notifications: hide_notifications)
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when mute.hide_notifications is true' do
let(:hide_notifications) { true }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when arg :notifications is nil' do
let(:arg_notifications) { nil }
it 'returns Mute without updating mute.hide_notifications' do
expect do
expect(subject).to be_a Mute
2023-02-20 02:33:27 +01:00
end.to_not change { mute.reload.hide_notifications? }.from(true)
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when arg :notifications is false' do
let(:arg_notifications) { false }
it 'returns Mute, and updates mute.hide_notifications false' do
expect do
expect(subject).to be_a Mute
end.to change { mute.reload.hide_notifications? }.from(true).to(false)
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when arg :notifications is true' do
let(:arg_notifications) { true }
it 'returns Mute without updating mute.hide_notifications' do
expect do
expect(subject).to be_a Mute
2023-02-20 02:33:27 +01:00
end.to_not change { mute.reload.hide_notifications? }.from(true)
end
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when mute.hide_notifications is false' do
let(:hide_notifications) { false }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when arg :notifications is nil' do
let(:arg_notifications) { nil }
it 'returns Mute, and updates mute.hide_notifications true' do
expect do
expect(subject).to be_a Mute
end.to change { mute.reload.hide_notifications? }.from(false).to(true)
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when arg :notifications is false' do
let(:arg_notifications) { false }
it 'returns Mute without updating mute.hide_notifications' do
expect do
expect(subject).to be_a Mute
2023-02-20 02:33:27 +01:00
end.to_not change { mute.reload.hide_notifications? }.from(false)
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when arg :notifications is true' do
let(:arg_notifications) { true }
it 'returns Mute, and updates mute.hide_notifications true' do
expect do
expect(subject).to be_a Mute
end.to change { mute.reload.hide_notifications? }.from(false).to(true)
end
end
end
end
end
describe '#mute_conversation!' do
subject { account.mute_conversation!(conversation) }
let(:conversation) { Fabricate(:conversation) }
it 'creates and returns ConversationMute' do
expect do
expect(subject).to be_a ConversationMute
end.to change { account.conversation_mutes.count }.by 1
end
end
describe '#block_domain!' do
subject { account.block_domain!(domain) }
let(:domain) { 'example.com' }
it 'creates and returns AccountDomainBlock' do
expect do
expect(subject).to be_a AccountDomainBlock
end.to change { account.domain_blocks.count }.by 1
end
end
describe '#unfollow!' do
subject { account.unfollow!(target_account) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when following target_account' do
it 'returns destroyed Follow' do
account.active_relationships.create(target_account: target_account)
expect(subject).to be_a Follow
expect(subject).to be_destroyed
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not following target_account' do
it 'returns nil' do
expect(subject).to be_nil
end
end
end
describe '#unblock!' do
subject { account.unblock!(target_account) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when blocking target_account' do
it 'returns destroyed Block' do
account.block_relationships.create(target_account: target_account)
expect(subject).to be_a Block
expect(subject).to be_destroyed
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not blocking target_account' do
it 'returns nil' do
expect(subject).to be_nil
end
end
end
describe '#unmute!' do
subject { account.unmute!(target_account) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when muting target_account' do
it 'returns destroyed Mute' do
account.mute_relationships.create(target_account: target_account)
expect(subject).to be_a Mute
expect(subject).to be_destroyed
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not muting target_account' do
it 'returns nil' do
expect(subject).to be_nil
end
end
end
describe '#unmute_conversation!' do
subject { account.unmute_conversation!(conversation) }
let(:conversation) { Fabricate(:conversation) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when muting the conversation' do
it 'returns destroyed ConversationMute' do
account.conversation_mutes.create(conversation: conversation)
expect(subject).to be_a ConversationMute
expect(subject).to be_destroyed
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not muting the conversation' do
it 'returns nil' do
expect(subject).to be_nil
end
end
end
describe '#unblock_domain!' do
subject { account.unblock_domain!(domain) }
let(:domain) { 'example.com' }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when blocking the domain' do
it 'returns destroyed AccountDomainBlock' do
account_domain_block = Fabricate(:account_domain_block, domain: domain)
account.domain_blocks << account_domain_block
expect(subject).to be_a AccountDomainBlock
expect(subject).to be_destroyed
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when unblocking the domain' do
it 'returns nil' do
expect(subject).to be_nil
end
end
end
describe '#following?' do
subject { account.following?(target_account) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when following target_account' do
it 'returns true' do
account.active_relationships.create(target_account: target_account)
expect(subject).to be true
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not following target_account' do
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject).to be false
end
end
end
describe '#followed_by?' do
subject { account.followed_by?(target_account) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when followed by target_account' do
it 'returns true' do
account.passive_relationships.create(account: target_account)
expect(subject).to be true
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not followed by target_account' do
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject).to be false
end
end
end
describe '#blocking?' do
subject { account.blocking?(target_account) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when blocking target_account' do
it 'returns true' do
account.block_relationships.create(target_account: target_account)
expect(subject).to be true
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not blocking target_account' do
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject).to be false
end
end
end
describe '#domain_blocking?' do
subject { account.domain_blocking?(domain) }
let(:domain) { 'example.com' }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when blocking the domain' do
it 'returns true' do
account_domain_block = Fabricate(:account_domain_block, domain: domain)
account.domain_blocks << account_domain_block
expect(subject).to be true
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not blocking the domain' do
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject).to be false
end
end
end
describe '#muting?' do
subject { account.muting?(target_account) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when muting target_account' do
it 'returns true' do
mute = Fabricate(:mute, account: account, target_account: target_account)
account.mute_relationships << mute
expect(subject).to be true
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not muting target_account' do
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject).to be false
end
end
end
describe '#muting_conversation?' do
subject { account.muting_conversation?(conversation) }
let(:conversation) { Fabricate(:conversation) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when muting the conversation' do
it 'returns true' do
account.conversation_mutes.create(conversation: conversation)
expect(subject).to be true
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not muting the conversation' do
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject).to be false
end
end
end
describe '#muting_notifications?' do
subject { account.muting_notifications?(target_account) }
before do
mute = Fabricate(:mute, target_account: target_account, account: account, hide_notifications: hide)
account.mute_relationships << mute
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when muting notifications of target_account' do
let(:hide) { true }
it 'returns true' do
expect(subject).to be true
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not muting notifications of target_account' do
let(:hide) { false }
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject).to be false
end
end
end
describe '#requested?' do
subject { account.requested?(target_account) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'with requested by target_account' do
it 'returns true' do
Fabricate(:follow_request, account: account, target_account: target_account)
expect(subject).to be true
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not requested by target_account' do
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject).to be false
end
end
end
describe '#favourited?' do
subject { account.favourited?(status) }
let(:status) { Fabricate(:status, account: account, favourites: favourites) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when favorited' do
let(:favourites) { [Fabricate(:favourite, account: account)] }
it 'returns true' do
expect(subject).to be true
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not favorited' do
let(:favourites) { [] }
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject).to be false
end
end
end
describe '#reblogged?' do
subject { account.reblogged?(status) }
let(:status) { Fabricate(:status, account: account, reblogs: reblogs) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'with reblogged' do
let(:reblogs) { [Fabricate(:status, account: account)] }
it 'returns true' do
expect(subject).to be true
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not reblogged' do
let(:reblogs) { [] }
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject).to be false
end
end
end
describe '#pinned?' do
subject { account.pinned?(status) }
let(:status) { Fabricate(:status, account: account) }
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when pinned' do
it 'returns true' do
Fabricate(:status_pin, account: account, status: status)
expect(subject).to be true
end
end
2023-05-04 05:49:08 +02:00
context 'when not pinned' do
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject).to be false
end
end
end
describe '#remote_followers_hash' do
Add follower synchronization mechanism (#14510) * Add support for followers synchronization on the receiving end Check the `collectionSynchronization` attribute on `Create` and `Announce` activities and synchronize followers from provided collection if possible. * Add tests for followers synchronization on the receiving end * Add support for follower synchronization on the sender's end * Add tests for the sending end * Switch from AS attributes to HTTP header Replace the custom `collectionSynchronization` ActivityStreams attribute by an HTTP header (`X-AS-Collection-Synchronization`) with the same syntax as the `Signature` header and the following fields: - `collectionId` to specify which collection to synchronize - `digest` for the SHA256 hex-digest of the list of followers known on the receiving instance (where “receiving instance” is determined by accounts sharing the same host name for their ActivityPub actor `id`) - `url` of a collection that should be fetched by the instance actor Internally, move away from the webfinger-based `domain` attribute and use account `uri` prefix to group accounts. * Add environment variable to disable followers synchronization Since the whole mechanism relies on some new preconditions that, in some extremely rare cases, might not be met, add an environment variable (DISABLE_FOLLOWERS_SYNCHRONIZATION) to disable the mechanism altogether and avoid followers being incorrectly removed. The current conditions are: 1. all managed accounts' actor `id` and inbox URL have the same URI scheme and netloc. 2. all accounts whose actor `id` or inbox URL share the same URI scheme and netloc as a managed account must be managed by the same Mastodon instance as well. As far as Mastodon is concerned, breaking those preconditions require extensive configuration changes in the reverse proxy and might also cause other issues. Therefore, this environment variable provides a way out for people with highly unusual configurations, and can be safely ignored for the overwhelming majority of Mastodon administrators. * Only set follower synchronization header on non-public statuses This is to avoid unnecessary computations and allow Follow-related activities to be handled by the usual codepath instead of going through the synchronization mechanism (otherwise, any Follow/Undo/Accept activity would trigger the synchronization mechanism even if processing the activity itself would be enough to re-introduce synchronization) * Change how ActivityPub::SynchronizeFollowersService handles follow requests If the remote lists a local follower which we only know has sent a follow request, consider the follow request as accepted instead of sending an Undo. * Integrate review feeback - rename X-AS-Collection-Synchronization to Collection-Synchronization - various minor refactoring and code style changes * Only select required fields when computing followers_hash * Use actor URI rather than webfinger domain in synchronization endpoint * Change hash computation to be a XOR of individual hashes Makes it much easier to be memory-efficient, and avoid sorting discrepancy issues. * Marginally improve followers_hash computation speed * Further improve hash computation performances by using pluck_each
2020-10-21 18:04:09 +02:00
let(:me) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'Me') }
let(:remote_alice) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'alice', domain: 'example.org', uri: 'https://example.org/users/alice') }
let(:remote_bob) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'bob', domain: 'example.org', uri: 'https://example.org/users/bob') }
let(:remote_instance_actor) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'instance-actor', domain: 'example.org', uri: 'https://example.org') }
let(:remote_eve) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'eve', domain: 'foo.org', uri: 'https://foo.org/users/eve') }
Add follower synchronization mechanism (#14510) * Add support for followers synchronization on the receiving end Check the `collectionSynchronization` attribute on `Create` and `Announce` activities and synchronize followers from provided collection if possible. * Add tests for followers synchronization on the receiving end * Add support for follower synchronization on the sender's end * Add tests for the sending end * Switch from AS attributes to HTTP header Replace the custom `collectionSynchronization` ActivityStreams attribute by an HTTP header (`X-AS-Collection-Synchronization`) with the same syntax as the `Signature` header and the following fields: - `collectionId` to specify which collection to synchronize - `digest` for the SHA256 hex-digest of the list of followers known on the receiving instance (where “receiving instance” is determined by accounts sharing the same host name for their ActivityPub actor `id`) - `url` of a collection that should be fetched by the instance actor Internally, move away from the webfinger-based `domain` attribute and use account `uri` prefix to group accounts. * Add environment variable to disable followers synchronization Since the whole mechanism relies on some new preconditions that, in some extremely rare cases, might not be met, add an environment variable (DISABLE_FOLLOWERS_SYNCHRONIZATION) to disable the mechanism altogether and avoid followers being incorrectly removed. The current conditions are: 1. all managed accounts' actor `id` and inbox URL have the same URI scheme and netloc. 2. all accounts whose actor `id` or inbox URL share the same URI scheme and netloc as a managed account must be managed by the same Mastodon instance as well. As far as Mastodon is concerned, breaking those preconditions require extensive configuration changes in the reverse proxy and might also cause other issues. Therefore, this environment variable provides a way out for people with highly unusual configurations, and can be safely ignored for the overwhelming majority of Mastodon administrators. * Only set follower synchronization header on non-public statuses This is to avoid unnecessary computations and allow Follow-related activities to be handled by the usual codepath instead of going through the synchronization mechanism (otherwise, any Follow/Undo/Accept activity would trigger the synchronization mechanism even if processing the activity itself would be enough to re-introduce synchronization) * Change how ActivityPub::SynchronizeFollowersService handles follow requests If the remote lists a local follower which we only know has sent a follow request, consider the follow request as accepted instead of sending an Undo. * Integrate review feeback - rename X-AS-Collection-Synchronization to Collection-Synchronization - various minor refactoring and code style changes * Only select required fields when computing followers_hash * Use actor URI rather than webfinger domain in synchronization endpoint * Change hash computation to be a XOR of individual hashes Makes it much easier to be memory-efficient, and avoid sorting discrepancy issues. * Marginally improve followers_hash computation speed * Further improve hash computation performances by using pluck_each
2020-10-21 18:04:09 +02:00
before do
remote_alice.follow!(me)
remote_bob.follow!(me)
remote_instance_actor.follow!(me)
remote_eve.follow!(me)
me.follow!(remote_alice)
Add follower synchronization mechanism (#14510) * Add support for followers synchronization on the receiving end Check the `collectionSynchronization` attribute on `Create` and `Announce` activities and synchronize followers from provided collection if possible. * Add tests for followers synchronization on the receiving end * Add support for follower synchronization on the sender's end * Add tests for the sending end * Switch from AS attributes to HTTP header Replace the custom `collectionSynchronization` ActivityStreams attribute by an HTTP header (`X-AS-Collection-Synchronization`) with the same syntax as the `Signature` header and the following fields: - `collectionId` to specify which collection to synchronize - `digest` for the SHA256 hex-digest of the list of followers known on the receiving instance (where “receiving instance” is determined by accounts sharing the same host name for their ActivityPub actor `id`) - `url` of a collection that should be fetched by the instance actor Internally, move away from the webfinger-based `domain` attribute and use account `uri` prefix to group accounts. * Add environment variable to disable followers synchronization Since the whole mechanism relies on some new preconditions that, in some extremely rare cases, might not be met, add an environment variable (DISABLE_FOLLOWERS_SYNCHRONIZATION) to disable the mechanism altogether and avoid followers being incorrectly removed. The current conditions are: 1. all managed accounts' actor `id` and inbox URL have the same URI scheme and netloc. 2. all accounts whose actor `id` or inbox URL share the same URI scheme and netloc as a managed account must be managed by the same Mastodon instance as well. As far as Mastodon is concerned, breaking those preconditions require extensive configuration changes in the reverse proxy and might also cause other issues. Therefore, this environment variable provides a way out for people with highly unusual configurations, and can be safely ignored for the overwhelming majority of Mastodon administrators. * Only set follower synchronization header on non-public statuses This is to avoid unnecessary computations and allow Follow-related activities to be handled by the usual codepath instead of going through the synchronization mechanism (otherwise, any Follow/Undo/Accept activity would trigger the synchronization mechanism even if processing the activity itself would be enough to re-introduce synchronization) * Change how ActivityPub::SynchronizeFollowersService handles follow requests If the remote lists a local follower which we only know has sent a follow request, consider the follow request as accepted instead of sending an Undo. * Integrate review feeback - rename X-AS-Collection-Synchronization to Collection-Synchronization - various minor refactoring and code style changes * Only select required fields when computing followers_hash * Use actor URI rather than webfinger domain in synchronization endpoint * Change hash computation to be a XOR of individual hashes Makes it much easier to be memory-efficient, and avoid sorting discrepancy issues. * Marginally improve followers_hash computation speed * Further improve hash computation performances by using pluck_each
2020-10-21 18:04:09 +02:00
end
it 'returns correct hash for remote domains' do
expect(me.remote_followers_hash('https://example.org/')).to eq '20aecbe774b3d61c25094370baf370012b9271c5b172ecedb05caff8d79ef0c7'
expect(me.remote_followers_hash('https://foo.org/')).to eq 'ccb9c18a67134cfff9d62c7f7e7eb88e6b803446c244b84265565f4eba29df0e'
expect(me.remote_followers_hash('https://foo.org.evil.com/')).to eq '0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000'
expect(me.remote_followers_hash('https://foo')).to eq '0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000'
end
Add follower synchronization mechanism (#14510) * Add support for followers synchronization on the receiving end Check the `collectionSynchronization` attribute on `Create` and `Announce` activities and synchronize followers from provided collection if possible. * Add tests for followers synchronization on the receiving end * Add support for follower synchronization on the sender's end * Add tests for the sending end * Switch from AS attributes to HTTP header Replace the custom `collectionSynchronization` ActivityStreams attribute by an HTTP header (`X-AS-Collection-Synchronization`) with the same syntax as the `Signature` header and the following fields: - `collectionId` to specify which collection to synchronize - `digest` for the SHA256 hex-digest of the list of followers known on the receiving instance (where “receiving instance” is determined by accounts sharing the same host name for their ActivityPub actor `id`) - `url` of a collection that should be fetched by the instance actor Internally, move away from the webfinger-based `domain` attribute and use account `uri` prefix to group accounts. * Add environment variable to disable followers synchronization Since the whole mechanism relies on some new preconditions that, in some extremely rare cases, might not be met, add an environment variable (DISABLE_FOLLOWERS_SYNCHRONIZATION) to disable the mechanism altogether and avoid followers being incorrectly removed. The current conditions are: 1. all managed accounts' actor `id` and inbox URL have the same URI scheme and netloc. 2. all accounts whose actor `id` or inbox URL share the same URI scheme and netloc as a managed account must be managed by the same Mastodon instance as well. As far as Mastodon is concerned, breaking those preconditions require extensive configuration changes in the reverse proxy and might also cause other issues. Therefore, this environment variable provides a way out for people with highly unusual configurations, and can be safely ignored for the overwhelming majority of Mastodon administrators. * Only set follower synchronization header on non-public statuses This is to avoid unnecessary computations and allow Follow-related activities to be handled by the usual codepath instead of going through the synchronization mechanism (otherwise, any Follow/Undo/Accept activity would trigger the synchronization mechanism even if processing the activity itself would be enough to re-introduce synchronization) * Change how ActivityPub::SynchronizeFollowersService handles follow requests If the remote lists a local follower which we only know has sent a follow request, consider the follow request as accepted instead of sending an Undo. * Integrate review feeback - rename X-AS-Collection-Synchronization to Collection-Synchronization - various minor refactoring and code style changes * Only select required fields when computing followers_hash * Use actor URI rather than webfinger domain in synchronization endpoint * Change hash computation to be a XOR of individual hashes Makes it much easier to be memory-efficient, and avoid sorting discrepancy issues. * Marginally improve followers_hash computation speed * Further improve hash computation performances by using pluck_each
2020-10-21 18:04:09 +02:00
it 'invalidates cache as needed when removing or adding followers' do
expect(me.remote_followers_hash('https://example.org/')).to eq '20aecbe774b3d61c25094370baf370012b9271c5b172ecedb05caff8d79ef0c7'
remote_instance_actor.unfollow!(me)
expect(me.remote_followers_hash('https://example.org/')).to eq '707962e297b7bd94468a21bc8e506a1bcea607a9142cd64e27c9b106b2a5f6ec'
remote_alice.unfollow!(me)
expect(me.remote_followers_hash('https://example.org/')).to eq '241b00794ce9b46aa864f3220afadef128318da2659782985bac5ed5bd436bff'
remote_alice.follow!(me)
expect(me.remote_followers_hash('https://example.org/')).to eq '707962e297b7bd94468a21bc8e506a1bcea607a9142cd64e27c9b106b2a5f6ec'
Add follower synchronization mechanism (#14510) * Add support for followers synchronization on the receiving end Check the `collectionSynchronization` attribute on `Create` and `Announce` activities and synchronize followers from provided collection if possible. * Add tests for followers synchronization on the receiving end * Add support for follower synchronization on the sender's end * Add tests for the sending end * Switch from AS attributes to HTTP header Replace the custom `collectionSynchronization` ActivityStreams attribute by an HTTP header (`X-AS-Collection-Synchronization`) with the same syntax as the `Signature` header and the following fields: - `collectionId` to specify which collection to synchronize - `digest` for the SHA256 hex-digest of the list of followers known on the receiving instance (where “receiving instance” is determined by accounts sharing the same host name for their ActivityPub actor `id`) - `url` of a collection that should be fetched by the instance actor Internally, move away from the webfinger-based `domain` attribute and use account `uri` prefix to group accounts. * Add environment variable to disable followers synchronization Since the whole mechanism relies on some new preconditions that, in some extremely rare cases, might not be met, add an environment variable (DISABLE_FOLLOWERS_SYNCHRONIZATION) to disable the mechanism altogether and avoid followers being incorrectly removed. The current conditions are: 1. all managed accounts' actor `id` and inbox URL have the same URI scheme and netloc. 2. all accounts whose actor `id` or inbox URL share the same URI scheme and netloc as a managed account must be managed by the same Mastodon instance as well. As far as Mastodon is concerned, breaking those preconditions require extensive configuration changes in the reverse proxy and might also cause other issues. Therefore, this environment variable provides a way out for people with highly unusual configurations, and can be safely ignored for the overwhelming majority of Mastodon administrators. * Only set follower synchronization header on non-public statuses This is to avoid unnecessary computations and allow Follow-related activities to be handled by the usual codepath instead of going through the synchronization mechanism (otherwise, any Follow/Undo/Accept activity would trigger the synchronization mechanism even if processing the activity itself would be enough to re-introduce synchronization) * Change how ActivityPub::SynchronizeFollowersService handles follow requests If the remote lists a local follower which we only know has sent a follow request, consider the follow request as accepted instead of sending an Undo. * Integrate review feeback - rename X-AS-Collection-Synchronization to Collection-Synchronization - various minor refactoring and code style changes * Only select required fields when computing followers_hash * Use actor URI rather than webfinger domain in synchronization endpoint * Change hash computation to be a XOR of individual hashes Makes it much easier to be memory-efficient, and avoid sorting discrepancy issues. * Marginally improve followers_hash computation speed * Further improve hash computation performances by using pluck_each
2020-10-21 18:04:09 +02:00
end
end
Add follower synchronization mechanism (#14510) * Add support for followers synchronization on the receiving end Check the `collectionSynchronization` attribute on `Create` and `Announce` activities and synchronize followers from provided collection if possible. * Add tests for followers synchronization on the receiving end * Add support for follower synchronization on the sender's end * Add tests for the sending end * Switch from AS attributes to HTTP header Replace the custom `collectionSynchronization` ActivityStreams attribute by an HTTP header (`X-AS-Collection-Synchronization`) with the same syntax as the `Signature` header and the following fields: - `collectionId` to specify which collection to synchronize - `digest` for the SHA256 hex-digest of the list of followers known on the receiving instance (where “receiving instance” is determined by accounts sharing the same host name for their ActivityPub actor `id`) - `url` of a collection that should be fetched by the instance actor Internally, move away from the webfinger-based `domain` attribute and use account `uri` prefix to group accounts. * Add environment variable to disable followers synchronization Since the whole mechanism relies on some new preconditions that, in some extremely rare cases, might not be met, add an environment variable (DISABLE_FOLLOWERS_SYNCHRONIZATION) to disable the mechanism altogether and avoid followers being incorrectly removed. The current conditions are: 1. all managed accounts' actor `id` and inbox URL have the same URI scheme and netloc. 2. all accounts whose actor `id` or inbox URL share the same URI scheme and netloc as a managed account must be managed by the same Mastodon instance as well. As far as Mastodon is concerned, breaking those preconditions require extensive configuration changes in the reverse proxy and might also cause other issues. Therefore, this environment variable provides a way out for people with highly unusual configurations, and can be safely ignored for the overwhelming majority of Mastodon administrators. * Only set follower synchronization header on non-public statuses This is to avoid unnecessary computations and allow Follow-related activities to be handled by the usual codepath instead of going through the synchronization mechanism (otherwise, any Follow/Undo/Accept activity would trigger the synchronization mechanism even if processing the activity itself would be enough to re-introduce synchronization) * Change how ActivityPub::SynchronizeFollowersService handles follow requests If the remote lists a local follower which we only know has sent a follow request, consider the follow request as accepted instead of sending an Undo. * Integrate review feeback - rename X-AS-Collection-Synchronization to Collection-Synchronization - various minor refactoring and code style changes * Only select required fields when computing followers_hash * Use actor URI rather than webfinger domain in synchronization endpoint * Change hash computation to be a XOR of individual hashes Makes it much easier to be memory-efficient, and avoid sorting discrepancy issues. * Marginally improve followers_hash computation speed * Further improve hash computation performances by using pluck_each
2020-10-21 18:04:09 +02:00
describe '#local_followers_hash' do
let(:me) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'Me') }
let(:remote_alice) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'alice', domain: 'example.org', uri: 'https://example.org/users/alice') }
Add follower synchronization mechanism (#14510) * Add support for followers synchronization on the receiving end Check the `collectionSynchronization` attribute on `Create` and `Announce` activities and synchronize followers from provided collection if possible. * Add tests for followers synchronization on the receiving end * Add support for follower synchronization on the sender's end * Add tests for the sending end * Switch from AS attributes to HTTP header Replace the custom `collectionSynchronization` ActivityStreams attribute by an HTTP header (`X-AS-Collection-Synchronization`) with the same syntax as the `Signature` header and the following fields: - `collectionId` to specify which collection to synchronize - `digest` for the SHA256 hex-digest of the list of followers known on the receiving instance (where “receiving instance” is determined by accounts sharing the same host name for their ActivityPub actor `id`) - `url` of a collection that should be fetched by the instance actor Internally, move away from the webfinger-based `domain` attribute and use account `uri` prefix to group accounts. * Add environment variable to disable followers synchronization Since the whole mechanism relies on some new preconditions that, in some extremely rare cases, might not be met, add an environment variable (DISABLE_FOLLOWERS_SYNCHRONIZATION) to disable the mechanism altogether and avoid followers being incorrectly removed. The current conditions are: 1. all managed accounts' actor `id` and inbox URL have the same URI scheme and netloc. 2. all accounts whose actor `id` or inbox URL share the same URI scheme and netloc as a managed account must be managed by the same Mastodon instance as well. As far as Mastodon is concerned, breaking those preconditions require extensive configuration changes in the reverse proxy and might also cause other issues. Therefore, this environment variable provides a way out for people with highly unusual configurations, and can be safely ignored for the overwhelming majority of Mastodon administrators. * Only set follower synchronization header on non-public statuses This is to avoid unnecessary computations and allow Follow-related activities to be handled by the usual codepath instead of going through the synchronization mechanism (otherwise, any Follow/Undo/Accept activity would trigger the synchronization mechanism even if processing the activity itself would be enough to re-introduce synchronization) * Change how ActivityPub::SynchronizeFollowersService handles follow requests If the remote lists a local follower which we only know has sent a follow request, consider the follow request as accepted instead of sending an Undo. * Integrate review feeback - rename X-AS-Collection-Synchronization to Collection-Synchronization - various minor refactoring and code style changes * Only select required fields when computing followers_hash * Use actor URI rather than webfinger domain in synchronization endpoint * Change hash computation to be a XOR of individual hashes Makes it much easier to be memory-efficient, and avoid sorting discrepancy issues. * Marginally improve followers_hash computation speed * Further improve hash computation performances by using pluck_each
2020-10-21 18:04:09 +02:00
before do
me.follow!(remote_alice)
end
it 'returns correct hash for local users' do
expect(remote_alice.local_followers_hash).to eq Digest::SHA256.hexdigest(ActivityPub::TagManager.instance.uri_for(me))
end
it 'invalidates cache as needed when removing or adding followers' do
expect(remote_alice.local_followers_hash).to eq Digest::SHA256.hexdigest(ActivityPub::TagManager.instance.uri_for(me))
me.unfollow!(remote_alice)
expect(remote_alice.local_followers_hash).to eq '0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000'
me.follow!(remote_alice)
expect(remote_alice.local_followers_hash).to eq Digest::SHA256.hexdigest(ActivityPub::TagManager.instance.uri_for(me))
Add follower synchronization mechanism (#14510) * Add support for followers synchronization on the receiving end Check the `collectionSynchronization` attribute on `Create` and `Announce` activities and synchronize followers from provided collection if possible. * Add tests for followers synchronization on the receiving end * Add support for follower synchronization on the sender's end * Add tests for the sending end * Switch from AS attributes to HTTP header Replace the custom `collectionSynchronization` ActivityStreams attribute by an HTTP header (`X-AS-Collection-Synchronization`) with the same syntax as the `Signature` header and the following fields: - `collectionId` to specify which collection to synchronize - `digest` for the SHA256 hex-digest of the list of followers known on the receiving instance (where “receiving instance” is determined by accounts sharing the same host name for their ActivityPub actor `id`) - `url` of a collection that should be fetched by the instance actor Internally, move away from the webfinger-based `domain` attribute and use account `uri` prefix to group accounts. * Add environment variable to disable followers synchronization Since the whole mechanism relies on some new preconditions that, in some extremely rare cases, might not be met, add an environment variable (DISABLE_FOLLOWERS_SYNCHRONIZATION) to disable the mechanism altogether and avoid followers being incorrectly removed. The current conditions are: 1. all managed accounts' actor `id` and inbox URL have the same URI scheme and netloc. 2. all accounts whose actor `id` or inbox URL share the same URI scheme and netloc as a managed account must be managed by the same Mastodon instance as well. As far as Mastodon is concerned, breaking those preconditions require extensive configuration changes in the reverse proxy and might also cause other issues. Therefore, this environment variable provides a way out for people with highly unusual configurations, and can be safely ignored for the overwhelming majority of Mastodon administrators. * Only set follower synchronization header on non-public statuses This is to avoid unnecessary computations and allow Follow-related activities to be handled by the usual codepath instead of going through the synchronization mechanism (otherwise, any Follow/Undo/Accept activity would trigger the synchronization mechanism even if processing the activity itself would be enough to re-introduce synchronization) * Change how ActivityPub::SynchronizeFollowersService handles follow requests If the remote lists a local follower which we only know has sent a follow request, consider the follow request as accepted instead of sending an Undo. * Integrate review feeback - rename X-AS-Collection-Synchronization to Collection-Synchronization - various minor refactoring and code style changes * Only select required fields when computing followers_hash * Use actor URI rather than webfinger domain in synchronization endpoint * Change hash computation to be a XOR of individual hashes Makes it much easier to be memory-efficient, and avoid sorting discrepancy issues. * Marginally improve followers_hash computation speed * Further improve hash computation performances by using pluck_each
2020-10-21 18:04:09 +02:00
end
end
Optional notification muting (#5087) * Add a hide_notifications column to mutes * Add muting_notifications? and a notifications argument to mute! * block notifications in notify_service from hard muted accounts * Add specs for how mute! interacts with muting_notifications? * specs testing that hide_notifications in mutes actually hides notifications * Add support for muting notifications in MuteService * API support for muting notifications (and specs) * Less gross passing of notifications flag * Break out a separate mute modal with a hide-notifications checkbox. * Convert profile header mute to use mute modal * Satisfy eslint. * specs for MuteService notifications params * add trailing newlines to files for Pork :) * Put the label for the hide notifications checkbox in a label element. * Add a /api/v1/mutes/details route that just returns the array of mutes. * Define a serializer for /api/v1/mutes/details * Add more specs for the /api/v1/mutes/details endpoint * Expose whether a mute hides notifications in the api/v1/relationships endpoint * Show whether muted users' notifications are muted in account lists * Allow modifying the hide_notifications of a mute with the /api/v1/accounts/:id/mute endpoint * make the hide/unhide notifications buttons work * satisfy eslint * In probably dead code, replace a dispatch of muteAccount that was skipping the modal with launching the mute modal. * fix a missing import * add an explanatory comment to AccountInteractions * Refactor handling of default params for muting to make code cleaner * minor code style fixes oops * Fixed a typo that was breaking the account mute API endpoint * Apply white-space: nowrap to account relationships icons * Fix code style issues * Remove superfluous blank line * Rename /api/v1/mutes/details -> /api/v2/mutes * Don't serialize "account" in MuteSerializer Doing so is somewhat unnecessary since it's always the current user's account. * Fix wrong variable name in api/v2/mutes * Use Toggle in place of checkbox in the mute modal. * Make the Toggle in the mute modal look better * Code style changes in specs and removed an extra space * Code review suggestions from akihikodaki Also fixed a syntax error in tests for AccountInteractions. * Make AddHideNotificationsToMute Concurrent It's not clear how much this will benefit instances in practice, as the number of mutes tends to be pretty small, but this should prevent any blocking migrations nonetheless. * Fix up migration things * Remove /api/v2/mutes
2017-11-15 03:56:41 +01:00
describe 'muting an account' do
let(:me) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'Me') }
let(:you) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'You') }
context 'with the notifications option unspecified' do
before do
me.mute!(you)
end
it 'defaults to muting notifications' do
expect(me.muting_notifications?(you)).to be true
end
end
context 'with the notifications option set to false' do
before do
me.mute!(you, notifications: false)
end
it 'does not mute notifications' do
expect(me.muting_notifications?(you)).to be false
end
end
context 'with the notifications option set to true' do
before do
me.mute!(you, notifications: true)
end
it 'does mute notifications' do
expect(me.muting_notifications?(you)).to be true
end
end
end
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 15:00:35 +01:00
describe 'ignoring reblogs from an account' do
let!(:me) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'Me') }
let!(:you) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'You') }
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 15:00:35 +01:00
context 'with the reblogs option unspecified' do
before do
me.follow!(you)
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 15:00:35 +01:00
end
it 'defaults to showing reblogs' do
expect(me.muting_reblogs?(you)).to be(false)
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 15:00:35 +01:00
end
end
context 'with the reblogs option set to false' do
before do
me.follow!(you, reblogs: false)
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 15:00:35 +01:00
end
it 'does mute reblogs' do
expect(me.muting_reblogs?(you)).to be(true)
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 15:00:35 +01:00
end
end
context 'with the reblogs option set to true' do
before do
me.follow!(you, reblogs: true)
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 15:00:35 +01:00
end
it 'does not mute reblogs' do
expect(me.muting_reblogs?(you)).to be(false)
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 15:00:35 +01:00
end
end
end
describe '#lists_for_local_distribution' do
let(:account) { Fabricate(:user, current_sign_in_at: Time.now.utc).account }
let!(:inactive_follower_user) { Fabricate(:user, current_sign_in_at: 5.years.ago) }
let!(:follower_user) { Fabricate(:user, current_sign_in_at: Time.now.utc) }
let!(:follow_request_user) { Fabricate(:user, current_sign_in_at: Time.now.utc) }
let!(:inactive_follower_list) { Fabricate(:list, account: inactive_follower_user.account) }
let!(:follower_list) { Fabricate(:list, account: follower_user.account) }
let!(:follow_request_list) { Fabricate(:list, account: follow_request_user.account) }
let!(:self_list) { Fabricate(:list, account: account) }
before do
inactive_follower_user.account.follow!(account)
follower_user.account.follow!(account)
follow_request_user.account.follow_requests.create!(target_account: account)
inactive_follower_list.accounts << account
follower_list.accounts << account
follow_request_list.accounts << account
self_list.accounts << account
end
it 'includes only the list from the active follower and from oneself' do
expect(account.lists_for_local_distribution.to_a).to contain_exactly(follower_list, self_list)
end
end
Optional notification muting (#5087) * Add a hide_notifications column to mutes * Add muting_notifications? and a notifications argument to mute! * block notifications in notify_service from hard muted accounts * Add specs for how mute! interacts with muting_notifications? * specs testing that hide_notifications in mutes actually hides notifications * Add support for muting notifications in MuteService * API support for muting notifications (and specs) * Less gross passing of notifications flag * Break out a separate mute modal with a hide-notifications checkbox. * Convert profile header mute to use mute modal * Satisfy eslint. * specs for MuteService notifications params * add trailing newlines to files for Pork :) * Put the label for the hide notifications checkbox in a label element. * Add a /api/v1/mutes/details route that just returns the array of mutes. * Define a serializer for /api/v1/mutes/details * Add more specs for the /api/v1/mutes/details endpoint * Expose whether a mute hides notifications in the api/v1/relationships endpoint * Show whether muted users' notifications are muted in account lists * Allow modifying the hide_notifications of a mute with the /api/v1/accounts/:id/mute endpoint * make the hide/unhide notifications buttons work * satisfy eslint * In probably dead code, replace a dispatch of muteAccount that was skipping the modal with launching the mute modal. * fix a missing import * add an explanatory comment to AccountInteractions * Refactor handling of default params for muting to make code cleaner * minor code style fixes oops * Fixed a typo that was breaking the account mute API endpoint * Apply white-space: nowrap to account relationships icons * Fix code style issues * Remove superfluous blank line * Rename /api/v1/mutes/details -> /api/v2/mutes * Don't serialize "account" in MuteSerializer Doing so is somewhat unnecessary since it's always the current user's account. * Fix wrong variable name in api/v2/mutes * Use Toggle in place of checkbox in the mute modal. * Make the Toggle in the mute modal look better * Code style changes in specs and removed an extra space * Code review suggestions from akihikodaki Also fixed a syntax error in tests for AccountInteractions. * Make AddHideNotificationsToMute Concurrent It's not clear how much this will benefit instances in practice, as the number of mutes tends to be pretty small, but this should prevent any blocking migrations nonetheless. * Fix up migration things * Remove /api/v2/mutes
2017-11-15 03:56:41 +01:00
end