Found via `codespell -q 3 -S ./yarn.lock,./CHANGELOG.md,./AUTHORS.md,./config/locales,./app/javascript/mastodon/locales -L ba,followings,keypair,medias,pattens,pixelx,rememberable,ro,te`
* Change unapproved and unconfirmed account to not be accessible in the REST API
* Change Account#searchable? to reject unconfirmed and unapproved users
* Disable search for unapproved and unconfirmed users in Account.search_for
* Disable search for unapproved and unconfirmed users in Account.advanced_search_for
* Remove unconfirmed and unapproved accounts from Account.searchable scope
* Prevent mentions to unapproved/unconfirmed accounts
* Fix some old tests for Account.advanced_search_for
* Add some Account.advanced_search_for tests for existing behaviors
* Add some tests for Account.search_for
* Add Account.advanced_search_for tests unconfirmed and unapproved accounts
* Add Account.searchable tests
* Fix Account.without_unapproved scope potentially messing with previously-applied scopes
* Allow lookup of unconfirmed/unapproved accounts through /api/v1/accounts/lookup
This is so that the API can still be used to check whether an username is free
to use.
* Change account and user fabricators to simplify and improve tests
- `Fabricate(:account)` implicitly fabricates an associated `user` if
no `domain` attribute is given (an account with `domain: nil` is
considered a local account, but no user record was created), unless
`user: nil` is passed
- `Fabricate(:account, user: Fabricate(:user))` should still be possible
but is discouraged.
* Fix and refactor tests
- avoid passing unneeded attributes to `Fabricate(:user)` or
`Fabricate(:account)`
- avoid embedding `Fabricate(:user)` into a `Fabricate(:account)` or the other
way around
- prefer `Fabricate(:user, account_attributes: …)` to
`Fabricate(:user, account: Fabricate(:account, …)`
- also, some tests were using remote accounts with local user records, which is
not representative of production code.
* Fix error when suspending user with an already-existing canonical email block
Fixes#17033
While attempting to create a `CanonicalEmailBlock` with an existing hash would
raise an `ActiveRecord::RecordNotUnique` error, this being done within a
transaction would cancel the whole transaction. For this reason, checking for
uniqueness in Rails would query the database within the transaction and avoid
invalidating the whole transaction for this reason.
A race condition is still possible, where multiple accounts sharing a canonical
email would be blocked in concurrent transactions, in which only one would
succeed, but that is way less likely to happen that the current issue, and can
always be retried after the first failure, unlike the current situation.
* Add tests
Matt Jankowski