try to write down the various naming & architectural conventions that the SDK adheres to...

pull/1/head
Matthew Hodgson 2015-07-07 17:46:06 +01:00
parent 0b20785ca0
commit 15c93b61aa
1 changed files with 83 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -39,3 +39,86 @@ react from your app) you must be sure to:
2. If you `npm link` matrix-react-sdk, manually remove the 'react' directory
from matrix-react-sdk's `node_modules` folder, otherwise browserify will
pull in both copies of react which causes the app to break.
How to customise the SDK
========================
The matrix-react-sdk has been built to be heavily customisable - letting
developers both create new skins by extending/overriding the CSS and View
classes provided in the base skin, as well as entirely replacing components as
required.
The SDK uses the 'atomic' design pattern as seen at http://patternlab.io to
encourage a very modular and reusable architecture, making it as easy to
customise and use UI widgets independently of the rest of the SDK and your app.
In practice this means:
* The UI of the app is strictly split up into a hierarchy of components.
* Each component has its own:
* View object defined as a React javascript class containing embedded
HTML expressed in React's JSX notation.
* CSS file, which defines the styling specific to that component.
* Components are loosely grouped into the 5 levels outlined by atomic design:
* atoms: fundamental building blocks (e.g. a timestamp tag)
* molecules: "group of atoms which functions together as a unit"
(e.g. a message in a chat timeline)
* organisms: "groups of molecules (and atoms) which form a distinct section
of a UI" (e.g. a view of a chat room)
* templates: "a reusable configuration of organisms" - used to combine and
style organisms into a well-defined global look and feel
* pages: specific instances of templates.
Good separation between the components is maintained by adopting various best
practices that anyone working with the SDK needs to be be aware of and uphold:
* Views are named with upper camel case (e.g. molecules/MessageTile.js)
* The view's CSS file MUST have the same name (e.g. molecules/MessageTile.css)
* Per-view CSS is optional - it could choose to inherit all its styling from
the context of the rest of the app, although this is unusual for any but
the simplest atoms and molecules.
* The view MUST *only* refer to the CSS rules defined in its own CSS file.
'Stealing' styling information from other components (including parents)
is not cool, as it breaks the independence of the components.
* CSS classes are named with an app-specific namespacing prefix to try to avoid
CSS collisions. The base skin shipped by Matrix.org with the matrix-react-sdk
uses the naming prefix "mx_". A company called Yoyodyne Inc might use a
prefix like "yy_" for its app-specific classes.
* CSS classes use upper camel case when they describe React components - e.g.
.mx_MessageTile is the selector for the CSS applied to a MessageTile view.
* CSS classes for DOM elements within a view which aren't components are named
by appending a lower camel case identifier to the view's class name - e.g.
.mx_MessageTile_randomDiv is how you'd name the class of an arbitrary div
within the MessageTile view.
* We deliberately use vanilla CSS 3.0 to avoid adding any more magic
dependencies into the mix than we already have. App developers are welcome
to use whatever floats their boat however.
* The CSS for a component can however override the rules for child components.
For instance, .mx_RoomList .mx_RoomTile {} would be the selector to override
styles of RoomTiles when viewed in the context of a RoomList view.
Overrides *must* be scoped to the View's CSS class - i.e. don't just define
.mx_RoomTile {} in RoomList.css - only RoomTile.css is allowed to define its
own CSS. Instead, say .mx_RoomList .mx_RoomTile {} to scope the override
only to the context of RoomList views. N.B. overrides should be relatively
rare as in general CSS inheritence should be enough.
* Components should render only within the bounding box of their outermost DOM
element. Page-absolute positioning and negative CSS margins and similar are
generally not cool and stop the component from being reused easily in
different places.
* We don't use the atomify library itself, as React already provides most
of the modularity requirements it brings to the table.
With all this in mind, here's how you go about skinning the react SDK UI
components to embed a Matrix client into your app: TODO. For now, check out
the examples and work it out for yourself...