chg: updates to firstcti22
parent
a6c9bd4f5d
commit
5187338f28
|
@ -319,18 +319,6 @@ Basically the same strategy as the one used in MISP:
|
|||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Data sharing: Planned synchronisation strategies}
|
||||
Two synchronisation strategies:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Standard}: Only fetch and save new records
|
||||
\item \textbf{Trusted upstream source}: Remote Cerebrate acts as an authoritative instance
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.7\linewidth]{pictures/brood-edit.png}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Managing local tools}
|
||||
Why would Cerebrate have integration with other tools?
|
||||
|
@ -409,27 +397,6 @@ There will inevitably be integration between local tools and Cerebrate. Why not
|
|||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Local tool interconnection via Cerebrate}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Local tools can be \textbf{exposed} to other Cerebrate nodes
|
||||
\item \textbf{Inter-connection requests} can be issued from one node to another
|
||||
\item Following a 3-way handshake protocol, inter-connections can be:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Issued
|
||||
\item Accepted
|
||||
\item Finalised
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Local tool interconnection via Cerebrate}
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.40\linewidth]{pictures/guys-chatting.png}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{MISP interconnection via Cerebrate}
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue