chg: updates to firstcti22

main
iglocska 2022-11-02 11:38:04 +01:00
parent a6c9bd4f5d
commit 5187338f28
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: BEA224F1FEF113AC
1 changed files with 0 additions and 33 deletions

View File

@ -319,18 +319,6 @@ Basically the same strategy as the one used in MISP:
\end{center} \end{center}
\end{frame} \end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Data sharing: Planned synchronisation strategies}
Two synchronisation strategies:
\begin{enumerate}
\item \textbf{Standard}: Only fetch and save new records
\item \textbf{Trusted upstream source}: Remote Cerebrate acts as an authoritative instance
\end{enumerate}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\linewidth]{pictures/brood-edit.png}
\end{center}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame} \begin{frame}
\frametitle{Managing local tools} \frametitle{Managing local tools}
Why would Cerebrate have integration with other tools? Why would Cerebrate have integration with other tools?
@ -409,27 +397,6 @@ There will inevitably be integration between local tools and Cerebrate. Why not
\end{center} \end{center}
\end{frame} \end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Local tool interconnection via Cerebrate}
\begin{itemize}
\item Local tools can be \textbf{exposed} to other Cerebrate nodes
\item \textbf{Inter-connection requests} can be issued from one node to another
\item Following a 3-way handshake protocol, inter-connections can be:
\begin{itemize}
\item Issued
\item Accepted
\item Finalised
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Local tool interconnection via Cerebrate}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.40\linewidth]{pictures/guys-chatting.png}
\end{center}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame} \begin{frame}
\frametitle{MISP interconnection via Cerebrate} \frametitle{MISP interconnection via Cerebrate}
\begin{center} \begin{center}