84 lines
2.8 KiB
JSON
84 lines
2.8 KiB
JSON
|
{
|
||
|
|
"namespace": "analyst-assessment",
|
||
|
|
"expanded": "Analyst (Self) Assessment",
|
||
|
|
"refs": [
|
||
|
|
"http://www.foo.be/docs/intelligence/Tversky_Kahneman_1974.pdf",
|
||
|
|
"http://www.foo.be/docs/intelligence/PsychofIntelNew.pdf"
|
||
|
|
],
|
||
|
|
"description": "A series of assessment predicates describing the analyst capabilities to perform analysis or making judgments under a certain level of uncertainty. These assessment can be assigned by the analyst him/herself or by another party evaluating the analyst.",
|
||
|
|
"version": 1,
|
||
|
|
"predicates": [
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"value": "experience",
|
||
|
|
"expanded": "Experience",
|
||
|
|
"description": "The analyst experience expressed in years range in the field tagged. The year range is based on a standard 40-hour work week."
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"value": "alternative-points-of-view-process",
|
||
|
|
"expanded": "Alternative points of view process",
|
||
|
|
"description": "A list of procedures or practices which describe alternative points of view to validate or rate an analysis. The list describes techniques or methods which could reinforce the estimative language in a human analysis and/or challenge the assumptions to reduce the potential bias of the analysis introduced by the analyst(s)."
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
],
|
||
|
|
"values": [
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"predicate": "experience",
|
||
|
|
"entry": [
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"numerical_value": 1,
|
||
|
|
"value": "less-than-1-year",
|
||
|
|
"expanded": "Less than 1 year"
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"numerical_value": 2,
|
||
|
|
"value": "between-1-and-5-years",
|
||
|
|
"expanded": "Between 1 and 5 years"
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"numerical_value": 3,
|
||
|
|
"value": "between-5-and-10-years",
|
||
|
|
"expanded": "Between 5 and 10 years"
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"numerical_value": 4,
|
||
|
|
"value": "between-10-and-20-years",
|
||
|
|
"expanded": "Between 10 and 20 years"
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"numerical_value": 5,
|
||
|
|
"value": "more-than-20-years",
|
||
|
|
"expanded": "More than 20 years"
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
]
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"predicate": "alternative-points-of-view-process",
|
||
|
|
"entry": [
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"value": "analytic-debates-within-the-organisation",
|
||
|
|
"expanded": "analytic debates within the organisation"
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"value": "devils-advocates-methodology",
|
||
|
|
"expanded": "Devil's advocates methodlogy"
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"value": "competitive-analysis",
|
||
|
|
"expanded": "competitive analysis"
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"value": "interdisciplinary-brainstorming",
|
||
|
|
"expanded": "interdisciplinary brainstorming"
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"value": "intra-office-peer-review",
|
||
|
|
"expanded": "intra-office peer review"
|
||
|
|
},
|
||
|
|
{
|
||
|
|
"value": "outside-expertise-review",
|
||
|
|
"expanded": "Outside expertise review"
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
]
|
||
|
|
}
|
||
|
|
]
|
||
|
|
}
|