mirror of https://github.com/MISP/misp-training
small changes
parent
51f68724ab
commit
9ec3f091f0
|
@ -148,20 +148,28 @@
|
|||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{The emergence of ATT\&CK and similar galaxies}
|
||||
\frametitle{The emergence of ATT\&CK}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Standardising on high-level {\bf TTPs} was a solution to a long list of issues
|
||||
\item Adoption was rapid, tools producing ATT\&CK data, familiar interface for users
|
||||
\item A much better take on kill-chain phases in general
|
||||
\item Feeds into our {\bf filtering} and {\bf situational awareness} needs extremely well
|
||||
\item Gave rise to other, ATT\&CK-like systems tackling other concerns
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{The emergence of ATT\&CK and similar galaxies}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item {\bf attck4fraud} \footnote{\url{https://www.misp-project.org/galaxy.html\#_attck4fraud}} by Francesco Bigarella from ING
|
||||
\item {\bf Election guidelines} \footnote{\url{https://www.misp-project.org/galaxy.html\#_election_guidelines}} by NIS Cooperation Group
|
||||
\item {\bf AM!TT Misinformation pattern} \footnote{\url{https://github.com/MISP/misp-galaxy/blob/master/clusters/misinfosec-amitt-misinformation-pattern.json}} by the misinfosecproject
|
||||
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{False positive handling}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
|
@ -244,7 +252,7 @@
|
|||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{A brief history of time - Timelines}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Not having the time based aspect was painful
|
||||
\item Data providers including the timing of the data has allowed us to include it directly in MISP
|
||||
\item {\bf \texttt{First\_seen}} and {\bf \texttt{last\_seen}} data points
|
||||
\item Along with a complete integration with the {\bf UI}
|
||||
\item Enables the {\bf visualisation} and {\bf adjustment} of indicators timeframes
|
||||
|
@ -316,6 +324,7 @@
|
|||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item We were still missing a way to use all of these systems in combination to decay indicators
|
||||
\item Move the decision making \textbf{from complex filter options to} complex \textbf{decay models}
|
||||
\item The idea is to {\bf not modify our data}, but to provide an overlay to make {\bf decisions on the fly}
|
||||
\item Decay models would take into account various available {\bf context}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Taxonomies
|
||||
|
@ -365,11 +374,12 @@
|
|||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Using the new {\bf built in dashboarding} system of MISP
|
||||
\item {\bf Customising MISP} for a specific use-case
|
||||
\item We are focusing on two areas of sharing:
|
||||
\item We are focusing on four areas of sharing:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item {\bf Medical} information
|
||||
\item {\bf Cyber threats} related to / abusing COVID-19
|
||||
\item COVID-19 related {\bf disinformation}
|
||||
\item {\bf Geo-political} events related to COVID-19
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\item Low barrier of entry, aiming for wide spread
|
||||
\item Already a {\bf massive community}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue