mirror of https://github.com/MISP/misp-training
chg: [b.4] Added timline and simplified decaying
parent
fb2a823a43
commit
cd59cd9c05
|
@ -17,9 +17,9 @@
|
|||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{The aim of this presentation}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Why is contextualisation important?
|
||||
\item Why is {\bf contextualisation} important?
|
||||
\item What options do we have in MISP?
|
||||
\item How can we leverage this in the end?
|
||||
\item How can we {\bf leverage} this in the end?
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -91,15 +91,17 @@
|
|||
\item Different organisational/community cultures require different nomenclatures
|
||||
\item Triple tag system - taxonomies
|
||||
\item JSON libraries that can easily be defined without our intervention
|
||||
***********PICPLZ
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{taxonomy-workflow.png}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Galaxies}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Taxonomy tags often {\bf non self-explanatory}
|
||||
\item Taxonomy tags often {\bf non self-explanatory}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Example: universal understanding of tlp:green vs APT 28
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\item For the latter, a single string was ill-suited
|
||||
\item So we needed something new in addition to taxonomies - \textbf{Galaxies}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
|
@ -170,7 +172,7 @@
|
|||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Supporting specific datamodel}
|
||||
\frametitle{Continuous feedback loop (2)}
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{sighting-n.png}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
|
@ -179,7 +181,17 @@
|
|||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
******TIMELINETHING
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{A brief history of time - Adding temporality to our data}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item {\bf 2.4.120} introduced {\bf \texttt{first\_seen}} and {\bf \texttt{last\_seen}}
|
||||
\item Along with a complete integration with the {\bf UI}
|
||||
\item {\bf Visualizating} and {\bf editing} time component effortlessly
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{timeline-misp-overview.png}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Encoding analyst knowledge to automatically leverage the above}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -266,12 +278,13 @@
|
|||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item We were still missing a way to use all of these systems in combination to decay indicators
|
||||
\item Move the decision making \textbf{from complex filter options to} complex \textbf{decay models}
|
||||
\item Decay models would take into account various \textbf{taxonomies}, \textbf{sightings}, the \textbf{type} of each indicator \textbf{Sightings} and \textbf{Creation date}
|
||||
\item The first iteration of what we have in MISP now took:
|
||||
\item Decay models would take into account various available {\bf context}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item 2 years of research
|
||||
\item 3 published research papers
|
||||
\item A lot of prototyping
|
||||
\item Taxonomies
|
||||
\item Sightings
|
||||
\item type of each indicator
|
||||
\item Creation date
|
||||
\item ...
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
@ -313,25 +326,12 @@
|
|||
\end{lstlisting}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Implementation in MISP: Index}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=1.00\linewidth]{decaying-index.png}
|
||||
View, update, add, create, delete, enable, export, import
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Implementation in MISP: Fine tuning tool}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=1.00\linewidth]{decaying-tool.png}
|
||||
Create, modify, visualise, perform mapping
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Implementation in MISP: \texttt{base\_score} tool}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=1.00\linewidth]{decaying-basescore.png}
|
||||
Adjust Taxonomies relative weights
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Implementation in MISP: simulation tool}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=1.00\linewidth]{decaying-simulation.png}
|
||||
|
@ -344,12 +344,7 @@
|
|||
\begin{lstlisting}
|
||||
{
|
||||
"includeDecayScore": 1,
|
||||
"includeFullModel": 0,
|
||||
"excludeDecayed": 0,
|
||||
"decayingModel": [85],
|
||||
"modelOverrides": {
|
||||
"threshold": 30
|
||||
}
|
||||
"score": 30,
|
||||
}
|
||||
\end{lstlisting}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
|
|||
all:
|
||||
pdflatex -interaction nonstopmode -halt-on-error -file-line-error slide.tex
|
||||
|
||||
clean:
|
||||
rm *.aux *.nav *.log *.snm *.toc *.vrb
|
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 146 KiB |
Loading…
Reference in New Issue