This allows for a truely flux-y way of storing the currently viewed room, making some callbacks (like onRoomIdResolved) redundant and making sure that the currently viewed room (ID) is only stored in one place as opposed to the previous many places.
This was required for the `join_room` action which can be dispatched to join the currently viewed room.
Another change was to introduce `LifeCycleStore` which is a start at encorporating state related to the lifecycle of the app into a flux store. Currently it only contains an action which will be dispatched when the sync state has become PREPARED. This was necessary to do a deferred dispatch of `join_room` following the registration of a PWLU (PassWord-Less User).
The following actions are introduced:
- RoomViewStore:
- `view_room`: dispatch to change the currently viewed room ID
- `join_room`: dispatch to join the currently viewed room
- LifecycleStore:
- `do_after_sync_prepared`: dispatch to store an action which will be dispatched when `sync_state` is dispatched with `state = 'PREPARED'`
- MatrixChat:
- `sync_state`: dispatched when the sync state changes. Ideally there'd be a SyncStateStore that emitted an `update` upon receiving this, but for now the `LifecycleStore` will listen for `sync_state` directly.
This wraps session-related state into a basic flux store. The localStorage item 'mx_pass' is the only thing managed by this store for now but it could easily be extended to track other items (like the teamToken which is passed around through props a lot)
- Replaces SetDisplayNameDialog with SetMxIdDialog. This new dialog will use InteractiveAuth to authenticate a user with their chosen mxid.
De-scoped:
- style tweaks for the InteractiveAuth in the dialog (capcha) and error message.
- checking for mxid availability
This means the riot-web will use the same teamToken used by sdk components. This includes cases where only the fragment query parameter has been provided.
Fixesmatrix-org/riot-web#3185
The idea here is to make a layer which sits around for as long as we have a
valid MatrixClient. Also it makes a plausible split for the render of
MatrixChat, even if they are much too tightly bound for now.
Luke Barnard