chg: [firstcti22] Few improvements and typos

firstcti2022/content.tex

@@ -31,6 +31,10 @@
             \item Cryptographic key lookup
         \end{itemize}
     \end{itemize}
+    \vspace{0.5em}
+    \begin{center}
+        \includegraphics[width=0.55\linewidth]{pictures/melicertes.png}
+    \end{center}
 \end{frame}
 
 \begin{frame}
@@ -41,10 +45,10 @@
         \item Interconnecting communities came with its own problems
         \begin{itemize}
             \item Interconnection requests
-            \item Organisation managmeent
+            \item Organisation management
             \item Enrollment process
         \end{itemize}
-        \item Finding and communicating with the right parties difficult
+        \item Finding and communicating with the right parties is difficult
         \item Managing multiple MISP instances can be tedious
     \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
@@ -81,11 +85,21 @@
     \begin{itemize}
         \item {Non-technical issues}
         \begin{itemize}
-            \item Sharing difficulties in terms of social interactions (e.g trust)
             \item Overwhelming amount of points of contacts
+            \item Sharing difficulties in terms of social interactions (e.g trust)
         \end{itemize}
     \end{itemize}
+    \vspace{1em}
+    \begin{minipage}{0.27\textwidth}
+        \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{pictures/firstcti-hastag.png}
+    \end{minipage}
+    \begin{minipage}{0.6\textwidth}
+        {\large greatly helps in that aspect!}
+    \end{minipage}
+\end{frame}
 
+\begin{frame}
+\frametitle{Issues we're trying to solve}
     \begin{itemize}
         \item {Technical issues}
         \begin{itemize}
@@ -95,7 +109,7 @@
         \end{itemize}
     \end{itemize}
     \begin{center}
-        \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{pictures/org-circl.png}
+        \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{pictures/org-circl.png}
     \end{center}
 \end{frame}
 
@@ -107,6 +121,7 @@
             \item Geographic \& sectorial
             \item But also technical: CIDR blocks \& AS Numbers
         \end{itemize}
+        \vspace{0.5em}
         \item Cryptographic key lookup for information signing
         \begin{itemize}
             \item MISP's protected event feature
@@ -216,8 +231,8 @@
         \item These \texttt{meta-fields} are part of a larger structure called \texttt{meta-templates}
         \item Support of multiple templates used by various entities out there
         \begin{itemize}
-            \item ENISA CSIRT inventory
             \item FIRST Directory
+            \item ENISA CSIRT inventory
             \item CSIRT Constituency (CIDR blocks, AS Numbers, ...)
         \end{itemize}
     \end{itemize}
@@ -319,18 +334,6 @@ Basically the same strategy as the one used in MISP:
     \end{center}
 \end{frame}
 
-\begin{frame}
-\frametitle{Data sharing: Planned synchronisation strategies}
-Two synchronisation strategies:
-    \begin{enumerate}
-        \item \textbf{Standard}: Only fetch and save new records
-        \item \textbf{Trusted upstream source}: Remote Cerebrate acts as an authoritative instance
-    \end{enumerate}
-    \begin{center}
-        \includegraphics[width=0.7\linewidth]{pictures/brood-edit.png}
-    \end{center}
-\end{frame}
-
 \begin{frame}
 \frametitle{Managing local tools}
 Why would Cerebrate have integration with other tools?
@@ -348,11 +351,11 @@ Why would Cerebrate have integration with other tools?
 \frametitle{Managing local tools}
 There will inevitably be integration between local tools and Cerebrate. Why not go a step further?
     \begin{itemize}
-        \item Cerebrate exposes a modular system to manage these local tools
+        \item Cerebrate exposes a modular system to {\bf manage these local tools}
         \item Based on a configuration file, user interfaces can be created to visualise data and instruct local tools to perform operations
     \end{itemize}
     \begin{center}
-        \includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{pictures/github-local-tool.png}
+        \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{pictures/github-local-tool.png}
     \end{center}
 \end{frame}
 
@@ -409,27 +412,6 @@ There will inevitably be integration between local tools and Cerebrate. Why not
     \end{center}
 \end{frame}
 
-\begin{frame}
-\frametitle{Local tool interconnection via Cerebrate}
-    \begin{itemize}
-        \item Local tools can be \textbf{exposed} to other Cerebrate nodes
-        \item \textbf{Inter-connection requests} can be issued from one node to another
-        \item Following a 3-way handshake protocol, inter-connections can be:
-        \begin{itemize}
-            \item Issued
-            \item Accepted
-            \item Finalised
-        \end{itemize}
-    \end{itemize}
-\end{frame}
-
-\begin{frame}
-\frametitle{Local tool interconnection via Cerebrate}
-    \begin{center}
-        \includegraphics[width=0.40\linewidth]{pictures/guys-chatting.png}
-    \end{center}
-\end{frame}
-
 \begin{frame}
 \frametitle{MISP interconnection via Cerebrate}
     \begin{center}